David N. Welton wrote:
> > Easy one. As seen on debian-devel@ recently, Progeny (I think,
> > correct me if I'm wrong) has this Componentized Linux idea. Which is
> > all nice and good, and should help custom distros all right. So, the
> > plans are set straight already.
>
> I saw Ian's online jou
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 08:47:35PM +0100, David N. Welton wrote:
> Gergely Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Easy one. As seen on debian-devel@ recently, Progeny (I think,
> > correct me if I'm wrong) has this Componentized Linux idea. Which is
> > all nice and good, and should help custom di
David N. Welton wrote:
> > Easy one. As seen on debian-devel@ recently, Progeny (I think,
> > correct me if I'm wrong) has this Componentized Linux idea. Which is
> > all nice and good, and should help custom distros all right. So, the
> > plans are set straight already.
>
> I saw Ian's online jou
On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 08:47:35PM +0100, David N. Welton wrote:
> Gergely Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Easy one. As seen on debian-devel@ recently, Progeny (I think,
> > correct me if I'm wrong) has this Componentized Linux idea. Which is
> > all nice and good, and should help custom di
Gergely Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Easy one. As seen on debian-devel@ recently, Progeny (I think,
> correct me if I'm wrong) has this Componentized Linux idea. Which is
> all nice and good, and should help custom distros all right. So, the
> plans are set straight already.
I saw Ian's onl
Gergely Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Easy one. As seen on debian-devel@ recently, Progeny (I think,
> correct me if I'm wrong) has this Componentized Linux idea. Which is
> all nice and good, and should help custom distros all right. So, the
> plans are set straight already.
I saw Ian's onl
6 matches
Mail list logo