On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 10:48:48PM +0200, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> 1. Debian currently supports more than 10 arches (just a quick check
> in /ports. Obviously, trying to keep in sync all of them is too much.
> And I hope I'm not the only one who sees that it's increasingly
> becoming a bu
* Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-17 11:24]:
> You might want to add to that something about a charter for the people
> who will be running it. [Something like: will coordinate with Debian
> where it makes sense.]
Yes, indeed. There are questions about who is going to run the
project, w
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 10:48:48PM +0200, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> 1. Debian currently supports more than 10 arches (just a quick check
> in /ports. Obviously, trying to keep in sync all of them is too much.
> And I hope I'm not the only one who sees that it's increasingly
> becoming a bu
* Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-17 11:24]:
> You might want to add to that something about a charter for the people
> who will be running it. [Something like: will coordinate with Debian
> where it makes sense.]
Yes, indeed. There are questions about who is going to run the
project, w
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 10:38:28PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> In my opinion, the transition should look like this:
> - a separate archive (e.g. non-free.org) should be set up, along with
>other infrastructure, such as a bug tracking system.
> - Packages should be moved there, bug report
On Sun, Mar 14, 2004 at 10:38:28PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> In my opinion, the transition should look like this:
> - a separate archive (e.g. non-free.org) should be set up, along with
>other infrastructure, such as a bug tracking system.
> - Packages should be moved there, bug report
* Konstantinos Margaritis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-14 22:48]:
> 1. Debian currently supports more than 10 arches (just a quick check
> in /ports. Obviously, trying to keep in sync all of them is too
> much. And I hope I'm not the only one who sees that it's
> increasingly becoming a burden to
Hi to all,
I have been following the past discussions on -vote, though I stayed
quiet, being busy etc.
Straight to the point:
1. Debian currently supports more than 10 arches (just a quick check
in /ports. Obviously, trying to keep in sync all of them is too much.
And I hope I'm not the only
* Konstantinos Margaritis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-14 22:48]:
> 1. Debian currently supports more than 10 arches (just a quick check
> in /ports. Obviously, trying to keep in sync all of them is too
> much. And I hope I'm not the only one who sees that it's
> increasingly becoming a burden to
Hi to all,
I have been following the past discussions on -vote, though I stayed
quiet, being busy etc.
Straight to the point:
1. Debian currently supports more than 10 arches (just a quick check
in /ports. Obviously, trying to keep in sync all of them is too much.
And I hope I'm not the only
10 matches
Mail list logo
