Adeodato Simó
> Are you deliberately lying here, to make your point prettier, or are
> you ciberately stating that Andrew lied himself in [3]?
Neither.
Thanks,
--
MJR/slef
My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/
Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct
--
MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Roger Leigh
>> I think that this behaviour, as well as that on other lists in the
>> recent past, is making it increasingly necessary that we introduce
>> some way of enforcing a minimum standard of decency on our lists. [...]
>
> You pillory[1] a man over his
* MJ Ray [Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:25:48 +]:
> to the point where he recoils from the project[3], don't answer
Are you deliberately lying here, to make your point prettier, or are
you ciberately stating that Andrew lied himself in [3]?
> 3. http://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2006/01/msg00
MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Nevertheless, Craig Sanders's colourful rants break the lists code
> of conduct far more clearly than posting satire to -devel-announce.
> Where are the winged angels of vengence? But then, the d-d-a ban
> didn't look like it was about enforcing the list codes
Roger Leigh
> I think that this behaviour, as well as that on other lists in the
> recent past, is making it increasingly necessary that we introduce
> some way of enforcing a minimum standard of decency on our lists. [...]
You pillory[1] a man over his -private beliefs about death[2]
to the point
5 matches
Mail list logo
