On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 08:32:00PM -0600, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> IIRC the adoption of Condorcet voting predates that web site; your
> best bet would be to go through the mailing list archives and find the
> discussions that led to the constitution (which predate my involvement
> in the project, II
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 08:32:00PM -0600, Chris Lawrence wrote:
> IIRC the adoption of Condorcet voting predates that web site; your
> best bet would be to go through the mailing list archives and find the
> discussions that led to the constitution (which predate my involvement
> in the project, II
Hi,
Nathanael Nerode:
> The site's claim that Approval voting doesn't satisfy the Condorcet
> Criterion is facile and inaccurate. With approval voting, for every
> preference order there are multiple 'cut-offs' which can be chosen by
> voters based on strength of preference and other criteria,
Hi,
Nathanael Nerode:
> The site's claim that Approval voting doesn't satisfy the Condorcet
> Criterion is facile and inaccurate. With approval voting, for every
> preference order there are multiple 'cut-offs' which can be chosen by
> voters based on strength of preference and other criteria,
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 09:33:34PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Yow, Debian uses a ludicrously complicated voting system.
>
> How was it chosen in the first place anyway?
200+ plus years of watching broken U.S. elections.
--
G. Branden Robinson|A celibate clergy is an es
On Nov 15, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> I won't push my own views any further; this isn't really meant to start
> a long argument over preferred election methods, which are as bad as OS
> wars. But thanks for pointing out the website which you made your
> decision from; it's all was I really askin
Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Hi,
Nathanael Nerode:
Yow, Debian uses a ludicrously complicated voting system.
How was it chosen in the first place anyway?
Voting algorithms should obey some stringent anti-politicking and
plain-common-sense restrictions.
See http://electionmethods.org/evaluation
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 09:33:34PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Yow, Debian uses a ludicrously complicated voting system.
>
> How was it chosen in the first place anyway?
200+ plus years of watching broken U.S. elections.
--
G. Branden Robinson|A celibate clergy is an es
On Nov 15, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> I won't push my own views any further; this isn't really meant to start
> a long argument over preferred election methods, which are as bad as OS
> wars. But thanks for pointing out the website which you made your
> decision from; it's all was I really askin
Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Hi,
Nathanael Nerode:
Yow, Debian uses a ludicrously complicated voting system.
How was it chosen in the first place anyway?
Voting algorithms should obey some stringent anti-politicking and
plain-common-sense restrictions.
See http://electionmethods.org/evaluation.
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 09:33:34PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Yow, Debian uses a ludicrously complicated voting system.
>
> How was it chosen in the first place anyway?
I'm not sure if you're talking about the existing constitution or
the proposed change. You don't say. If you're really in
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 09:33:34PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Yow, Debian uses a ludicrously complicated voting system.
>
> How was it chosen in the first place anyway?
I'm not sure if you're talking about the existing constitution or
the proposed change. You don't say. If you're really in
Hi,
Nathanael Nerode:
> Still wondering how the voting system was picked.
>
... didn't you get my email?
--
Matthias Urlichs | noris network AG | http://smurf.noris.de/
pgpO5TNCqcVdh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
Nathanael Nerode:
> Yow, Debian uses a ludicrously complicated voting system.
>
> How was it chosen in the first place anyway?
>
Voting algorithms should obey some stringent anti-politicking and
plain-common-sense restrictions.
See http://electionmethods.org/evaluation.htm for one list of s
Hi,
Nathanael Nerode:
> Still wondering how the voting system was picked.
>
... didn't you get my email?
--
Matthias Urlichs | noris network AG | http://smurf.noris.de/
msg01926/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
Nathanael Nerode:
> Yow, Debian uses a ludicrously complicated voting system.
>
> How was it chosen in the first place anyway?
>
Voting algorithms should obey some stringent anti-politicking and
plain-common-sense restrictions.
See http://electionmethods.org/evaluation.htm for one list of s
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 02:15:52AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> >What would ever give you the idea that we try to avoid schisms?
> Obviously you don't. :-) *I* do, which is why I like approval voting.
> Still wondering how the voting system was picked.
It's the state of the art in election s
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 09:33:34PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Yow, Debian uses a ludicrously complicated voting system.
How was it chosen in the first place anyway?
(Personally, I'm an approval voting fan. Easy to understand, and
particularly good when the mos
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 09:33:34PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Yow, Debian uses a ludicrously complicated voting system.
> How was it chosen in the first place anyway?
> (Personally, I'm an approval voting fan. Easy to understand, and
> particularly good when the most important thing is to
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 02:15:52AM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> >What would ever give you the idea that we try to avoid schisms?
> Obviously you don't. :-) *I* do, which is why I like approval voting.
> Still wondering how the voting system was picked.
It's the state of the art in election s
Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 09:33:34PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
Yow, Debian uses a ludicrously complicated voting system.
How was it chosen in the first place anyway?
(Personally, I'm an approval voting fan. Easy to understand, and
particularly good when the mos
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 09:33:34PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Yow, Debian uses a ludicrously complicated voting system.
> How was it chosen in the first place anyway?
> (Personally, I'm an approval voting fan. Easy to understand, and
> particularly good when the most important thing is to
Yow, Debian uses a ludicrously complicated voting system.
How was it chosen in the first place anyway?
(Personally, I'm an approval voting fan. Easy to understand, and
particularly good when the most important thing is to avoid causing a
furious schism.)
--Nathanael
Yow, Debian uses a ludicrously complicated voting system.
How was it chosen in the first place anyway?
(Personally, I'm an approval voting fan. Easy to understand, and
particularly good when the most important thing is to avoid causing a
furious schism.)
--Nathanael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
24 matches
Mail list logo
