On 11 Feb 2006, Jérôme Marant spake thusly:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On 11 Feb 2006, Jérôme Marant outgrape:
>>
>>> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
>> On 9 Feb 2006, Jérôme Marant spake thusly:
>>> The only people it made happy are extremists.
>
2006/2/11, Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> There isn't anything to do with politess. If I hurted you, them please
> accept my apologies. But I'm frank enough to express my view as I
> feel them. As a non-native English speaker, the vocabulary might
> not always be appropriate.
Hmm, you should
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 11 Feb 2006, Jérôme Marant outgrape:
>
>> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
> On 9 Feb 2006, Jérôme Marant spake thusly:
>> The only people it made happy are extremists.
>>>
>>> Oh, so I am extremist now. By believing that al
On 11 Feb 2006, Jérôme Marant stated:
> Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> Would you please tell me how necessary it is to modify RMS essays,
>>> the GNU Manifesto, and so on, and how removing them from Emacs
>>> will make Debian m
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Would you please tell me how necessary it is to modify RMS essays, the
>> GNU Manifesto, and so on, and how removing them from Emacs will make
>> Debian more free? I'm afraid it sounds ideological.
>
On 11 Feb 2006, Jérôme Marant outgrape:
> Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
On 9 Feb 2006, Jérôme Marant spake thusly:
> The only people it made happy are extremists.
>>
>> Oh, so I am extremist now. By believing that all bits
>> modifiable by the computer are software? And
Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Would you please tell me how necessary it is to modify RMS essays, the
> GNU Manifesto, and so on, and how removing them from Emacs will make
> Debian more free? I'm afraid it sounds ideological.
Actually, I'd rather we could keep them.
And we do have
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>On 9 Feb 2006, Jérôme Marant spake thusly:
The only people it made happy are extremists.
>
> Oh, so I am extremist now. By believing that all bits
> modifiable by the computer are software? And the overwhelming
Yes, I think it is an
On 9 Feb 2006, Marco d'Itri spake thusly:
>On Feb 09, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Moreover, while I think a majority of the developers are surely
>> honorable, this is not true of everyone. Now that this is the *third*
>> time we are being asked to vote on essentially the sa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
At this point, with 244 ballots resulting in 216 votes from
214 developers, "Choice 1: Change the Social Contract [3:1 majority
needed]" has carried the day., with a 4.462:1majority, well over the
3:1 needed.
The list of voters
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
At this point, with 244 ballots resulting in 216 votes from
214 developers, "Choice 1: Change the Social Contract [3:1 majority
needed]" has carried the day., with a 4.462:1majority, well over the
3:1 needed.
The list of voters
Sunday, April 11th, 23:59:59 UTC, 2004
| Votes must be received by Sunday, April 25st, 23:59:59 UTC, 2004
|
| The following ballot is for voting on a General Resolution to add
| editorial changes to the Social Contract. The vote is being conducted
| in accordance with the policy delineated in
Sunday, April 11th, 23:59:59 UTC, 2004
| Votes must be received by Sunday, April 25st, 23:59:59 UTC, 2004
|
| The following ballot is for voting on a General Resolution to add
| editorial changes to the Social Contract. The vote is being conducted
| in accordance with the policy delineated in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
-=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
[ ] Choice 1: Change the Social Contract [3:1 majority needed]
[ 1 ] Choice 2: Further Discussion
-=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
- --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
-=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
[ ] Choice 1: Change the Social Contract [3:1 majority needed]
[ 1 ] Choice 2: Further Discussion
-=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
- --
Votes must be received by Sunday, April 25st, 23:59:59 UTC, 2004
The following ballot is for voting on a General Resolution to add
editorial changes to the Social Contract. The vote is being conducted
in accordance with the policy delineated in Section A, Standard
Resolution Procedure, of the
Votes must be received by Sunday, April 25st, 23:59:59 UTC, 2004
The following ballot is for voting on a General Resolution to add
editorial changes to the Social Contract. The vote is being conducted
in accordance with the policy delineated in Section A, Standard
Resolution Procedure, of the
17 matches
Mail list logo