MJ Ray wrote:
> That treads on the singular "they" landmine. Also, it sounds like
> it's the Debian Developer's validity in question.
>
> How about "Debian Developers may nominate themselves by sending a
> signed email to debian-vote@lists.debian.org"?
>
How about: "To be valid, a Debian Devel
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 02:39:46PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
>l...@liw.fi wrote:
>
>>While I agree with Ben, perhaps we could retire this, the 12765th
>>iteration of this discussion, in favor of having a discussion about
>>platforms and some Q&A with the candidates?
>Maybe this is a good time to a
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 02:39:46PM +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> Maybe this is a good time to ask the candidates what is their position
> wrt this PC bullshit.
> So candidates, what do you think about this?
[ Just assuming this was a serious question, otherwise shame on me for
keeping this thread
l...@liw.fi wrote:
>While I agree with Ben, perhaps we could retire this, the 12765th
>iteration of this discussion, in favor of having a discussion about
>platforms and some Q&A with the candidates?
Maybe this is a good time to ask the candidates what is their position
wrt this PC bullshit.
So ca
ma, 2009-03-09 kello 19:37 +1100, Ben Finney kirjoitti:
> Matthew Johnson writes:
>
> > How about accepting that "he" is the gender-neutral pronoun in
> > English?
>
> Because that's not true; “he” is a male-gender pronoun.
While I agree with Ben, perhaps we could retire this, the 12765th
iter
Matthew Johnson writes:
> How about accepting that "he" is the gender-neutral pronoun in
> English?
Because that's not true; “he” is a male-gender pronoun. The pronoun
“he” is sometimes awkwardly and explicitly defined for
gender-neutral use in specific cases, but it's never the case that
“he” i
On Sun Mar 08 23:40, MJ Ray wrote:
>
> How about "Shepherds Bush (Central line)"?
>
How about accepting that "he" is the gender-neutral pronoun in English?
--
Matthew Johnson
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Carsten Hey wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 10:53:17AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 02:18:03PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > "To be valid, a Debian Developers can send a signed email in which they
> > > nominate themselves, to the debian-vote@lists.debian.org lis
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 10:53:17AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 02:18:03PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > "To be valid, a Debian Developers can send a signed email in which they
> > nominate themselves, to the debian-vote@lists.debian.org lists"
>
> > this nicely avoid
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 10:53:17AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 02:18:03PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > "To be valid, a Debian Developers can send a signed email in which they
> > nominate themselves, to the debian-vote@lists.debian.org lists"
>
> "a Debian Developers
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 02:18:03PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> You mean I can nominate someone else? ;-P
> (suggested phrasing:
> "To be valid, a Debian Developers can send a signed email in which they
> nominate themselves, to the debian-vote@lists.debian.org lists"
> this nicely avoids gen
On Sat, Mar 7, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 02:18:03PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 12:11:16PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>> > On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 12:53:10AM +, Per Andersson wrote:
>> > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Debian Pr
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 01:36:04PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 06:46:31PM +0100, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >The nomination period for the DPL election is almost over. If you
> >want to nominate yourself as canidate you need to send a signed
> >mail to
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 02:18:03PM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 12:11:16PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 12:53:10AM +, Per Andersson wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Debian Project Secretary
> > > wrote:
> > > > To be valid, a Debi
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 06:46:31PM +0100, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
>Hi,
>
>The nomination period for the DPL election is almost over. If you
>want to nominate yourself as canidate you need to send a signed
>mail to the debian-vote@lists.debian.org list.
I hereby nominate myself as a candid
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 12:11:16PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 12:53:10AM +, Per Andersson wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Debian Project Secretary
> > wrote:
> > > To be valid, a Debian Developer needs to send a signed email in
> > > which he nominates himse
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 12:53:10AM +, Per Andersson wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Debian Project Secretary
> wrote:
> > To be valid, a Debian Developer needs to send a signed email in
> > which he nominates himself to the debian-vote@lists.debian.org
> > list.
>
> Can't women nomin
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 12:53:10AM +, Per Andersson wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Debian Project Secretary
> wrote:
> > To be valid, a Debian Developer needs to send a signed email in
> > which he nominates himself to the debian-vote@lists.debian.org
> > list.
> Can't women nominat
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Debian Project Secretary
wrote:
> To be valid, a Debian Developer needs to send a signed email in
> which he nominates himself to the debian-vote@lists.debian.org
> list.
Can't women nominate themselves?
Best regards,
Per
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vot
19 matches
Mail list logo
