Re: Debian-EM Joint Committee

2000-12-19 Thread Norman Petry
Raul Miller wrote: >On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 03:41:21PM -0600, Norman Petry wrote: >> ... we have formed a joint committee to develop a proposal, which we >> will probably present to Debian for internal discussion in about a >> month's time (I'm just guessing on the timeframe; we haven't discussed

Re: Debian-EM Joint Committee

2000-12-18 Thread Norman Petry
Raul Miller wrote: >On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 03:41:21PM -0600, Norman Petry wrote: >> ... we have formed a joint committee to develop a proposal, which we >> will probably present to Debian for internal discussion in about a >> month's time (I'm just guessing on the timeframe; we haven't discussed

Re: Debian-EM Joint Committee

2000-12-18 Thread Sam Hartman
1. SIMPLE MAJORITIES SHOULD RESOLVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMBIGUITY: The I would be reluctant to vote for a proposal that allowed majorities to decide ambiguity. First, I am concerned that it might be open to abuse. Secondly, I believe that the policy making process should be distinct from the pro

Re: Debian-EM Joint Committee

2000-12-18 Thread Raul Miller
> Again, please write to me if you'd like to join our committee. I'd like to. Thanks, -- Raul

Re: Debian-EM Joint Committee

2000-12-18 Thread Raul Miller
On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 03:41:21PM -0600, Norman Petry wrote: > ... we have formed a joint committee to develop a proposal, which we > will probably present to Debian for internal discussion in about a > month's time (I'm just guessing on the timeframe; we haven't discussed > this). This looks pre

Re: Debian-EM Joint Committee

2000-12-18 Thread Sam Hartman
1. SIMPLE MAJORITIES SHOULD RESOLVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMBIGUITY: The I would be reluctant to vote for a proposal that allowed majorities to decide ambiguity. First, I am concerned that it might be open to abuse. Secondly, I believe that the policy making process should be distinct from the pr

Re: Debian-EM Joint Committee

2000-12-18 Thread Raul Miller
> Again, please write to me if you'd like to join our committee. I'd like to. Thanks, -- Raul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Debian-EM Joint Committee

2000-12-18 Thread Raul Miller
On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 03:41:21PM -0600, Norman Petry wrote: > ... we have formed a joint committee to develop a proposal, which we > will probably present to Debian for internal discussion in about a > month's time (I'm just guessing on the timeframe; we haven't discussed > this). This looks pr

Debian-EM Joint Committee

2000-12-18 Thread Norman Petry
Raul Miller wrote: >Well, no one has sponsored my proposal to amend the constitution. >And, no one has issued any other proposals to fix the ambiguities >of the constitution. I thought I should mention now that some members of Debian, together with a few of us from the Election Methods (EM) list,

Debian-EM Joint Committee

2000-12-18 Thread Norman Petry
Raul Miller wrote: >Well, no one has sponsored my proposal to amend the constitution. >And, no one has issued any other proposals to fix the ambiguities >of the constitution. I thought I should mention now that some members of Debian, together with a few of us from the Election Methods (EM) list