Re: DPL Debates [Re: Debian Project Leader Election 2009]

2009-03-09 Thread Don Armstrong
On Mon, 09 Mar 2009, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > >> If someone can't set up a poll, I'll send another message asking for > >> DDs to privately mail me (or maybe me-too to -vote) if they find the > >> debates useful. > > http://doodle.com/nmpesn9t5fwv6ewe > > Having this run for 7 days now, we had 72 pa

Re: DPL Debates [Re: Debian Project Leader Election 2009]

2009-03-09 Thread Joerg Jaspert
>> If someone can't set up a poll, I'll send another message asking for >> DDs to privately mail me (or maybe me-too to -vote) if they find the >> debates useful. > http://doodle.com/nmpesn9t5fwv6ewe Having this run for 7 days now, we had 72 participants. The question asked was "Are the Debian D

Re: DPL Debates [Re: Debian Project Leader Election 2009]

2009-03-02 Thread Joerg Jaspert
> Perhaps someone could set up a poll for DDs to indicate whether they > find the debates useful or not? [I think Jeroen was doing this last?] > If someone can't set up a poll, I'll send another message asking for > DDs to privately mail me (or maybe me-too to -vote) if they find the > debates use

Re: DPL Debates [Re: Debian Project Leader Election 2009]

2009-03-01 Thread MJ Ray
Steve Langasek wrote: [...] > I'd like to raise the question of whether these IRC debates are really > something we should have. I know Don and the panelists put a lot of time > and effort into making the debates happen, which is part of why I ask the > question: is it really worth all this effo

Re: DPL Debates [Re: Debian Project Leader Election 2009]

2009-03-01 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 01:57:24PM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote: >Maybe folks decide who they would like before the voting starts which >would avoid the need for anything like an IRC chat or a ML discussion. >Would it useful to get a sense of how DD's de

Re: DPL Debates [Re: Debian Project Leader Election 2009]

2009-03-01 Thread Kevin Mark
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 09:50:24PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 02:10:38AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: > > On Sat, 21 Feb 2009, Debian Project Secretary wrote: > > > | Period | Start| End| > > > |+

Re: DPL Debates [Re: Debian Project Leader Election 2009]

2009-02-27 Thread Don Armstrong
On Fri, 27 Feb 2009, Steve Langasek wrote: > I'd like to raise the question of whether these IRC debates are > really something we should have. I know Don and the panelists put a > lot of time and effort into making the debates happen, which is part > of why I ask the question: is it really worth a

Re: DPL Debates [Re: Debian Project Leader Election 2009]

2009-02-27 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 02:10:38AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Sat, 21 Feb 2009, Debian Project Secretary wrote: > > | Period | Start| End| > > |+--+| > > | Nomination | Sunday, Marc

Re: DPL Debates [Re: Debian Project Leader Election 2009]

2009-02-27 Thread MJ Ray
Don Armstrong wrote: > People who'd like to help run the debate and/or collect questions can > also volunteer with a message to -vote. I'd like to do either, as previous years. Regards, -- MJR/slef My Opinion Only: see http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Please follow http://www.uk.debian.org/Mailin

Re: DPL Debates [Re: Debian Project Leader Election 2009]

2009-02-27 Thread Stefano Zacchiroli
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 02:10:38AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote: > 1.618: Yes, for some reason I've adopted irrational footnote > numbering. Don't ask why.[2.718] Actually, no. As long as you are bound to write them in finite space using decimal notation, your footnotes still look like terribly rat

DPL Debates [Re: Debian Project Leader Election 2009]

2009-02-27 Thread Don Armstrong
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009, Debian Project Secretary wrote: > | Period | Start| End| > |+--+| > | Nomination | Sunday, March 1st, 2009 | Saterday, March 7th, 2009 | > | Campaign | Sunday, Ma