Re: Condorcet cuckoos: promoting the method by having it get the winners wrong

At 03\04\22 10:35 +0200 Tuesday, Matthias Urlichs wrote: >[] Re Condorcet cuckoos promotin3.ems >*** PGP Signature Status: unknown >*** Signer: Unknown, Key ID xD70AAFF9 >*** Signed: 03\04\22 8:35:55 PM >*** Verified: 03\04\22 10:21:05 PM >*** BEGIN PGP VERIFIED MESSAGE *** > >Hi, > >Jochen Voss w

Re: Condorcet cuckoos: promoting the method by having it get the winners wrong

Hi, Jochen Voss wrote: > [ Cc to debian-vote, bacause it may be of general interest. ] > It would be if he had actually answered the question. -- Matthias Urlichs|{M:U} Consulting|http://smurf.noris.de/ -- I am treated as evil by people who claim that they are being oppressed be

Re: Condorcet cuckoos: promoting the method by having it get the winners wrong

[ Cc to debian-vote, bacause it may be of general interest. ] Hello, On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 07:37:53PM +1200, Craig Carey wrote: > At 03\04\21 22:42 +0200 Monday, Jochen Voss wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 08:22:51PM +1200, Craig Carey wrote: > > > Jochen Voss keeps online a false claim that