On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 01:12:56PM +0300, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
> Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Given the latest mail from Anthony Towns ("Firmware & Social Contract:
> > GR proposal"), it looks like I was correct. He just try to stop this
> > GR by proposing his own one.
>
> The D
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 01:12:56PM +0300, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
> Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Given the latest mail from Anthony Towns ("Firmware & Social Contract:
> > GR proposal"), it looks like I was correct. He just try to stop this
> > GR by proposing his own one.
>
> The D
Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Given the latest mail from Anthony Towns ("Firmware & Social Contract:
> GR proposal"), it looks like I was correct. He just try to stop this
> GR by proposing his own one.
The DPL has the same right as the other developers to propose GR's
that he feels
Joey Hess a écrit :
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Not also that I found sad that the DPL try to kill this GR with his
latest mail to debian-announce. The problem is known for a long time.
How does posting straw polls of our users and developers to d-d-a manage
to look to you like an attempt to stop t
On Thu, Aug 31, 2006 at 01:01:45AM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > and probably the absense of
> > initramfs support, as we have now.
>
> Yes, there was some complaint about the lack of easy support for
> installing the firmware in the initrd. Which is not technically a b
Sven Luther wrote:
> I heard claims of buginess in the patch,
The buggy one was my radeon patch. It's rather hard to get right because
of the complex interaction between X and the kernel, and because the DRI
trunk doesn't like Linux-specific things, and we never did track down the
problem. I'm
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 09:11:50PM -0400, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>
>
> Josselin Mouette wrote:
>
> > I propose the following amendment to Steve's proposal.
> >
> >> THE DEBIAN PROJECT therefore,
> >>
> >> 1. reaffirms its dedication to providing a 100% free system to
> >> our
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> I propose the following amendment to Steve's proposal.
>
>> THE DEBIAN PROJECT therefore,
>>
>> 1. reaffirms its dedication to providing a 100% free system to
>> our
>> users according to our Social Contract and the DFSG; and
>>
>> 2. encourag
Le mardi 29 août 2006 à 14:15 -0400, Joey Hess a écrit :
> > If he wanted to help, it should have been done that before, not a 3
> > months before the announced date of the release. And also not while
> > proposals are beeing discussed. He just want to be awarded because he
> > found a solution t
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Not also that I found sad that the DPL try to kill this GR with his
> latest mail to debian-announce. The problem is known for a long time.
How does posting straw polls of our users and developers to d-d-a manage
to look to you like an attempt to stop this GR?
> If he wa
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 11:37:20AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> I propose the following amendment to Steve's proposal.
>
> > THE DEBIAN PROJECT therefore,
> >
> > 1. reaffirms its dedication to providing a 100% free system to our
> > users according to our Social Contract and the DFSG
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 11:37:20AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> I propose the following amendment to Steve's proposal.
>
> > THE DEBIAN PROJECT therefore,
> >
> > 1. reaffirms its dedication to providing a 100% free system to our
> > users according to our Social Contract and the DFSG
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 11:37:20AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> I propose the following amendment to Steve's proposal.
>
> > THE DEBIAN PROJECT therefore,
> >
> > 1. reaffirms its dedication to providing a 100% free system to our
> > users according to our Social Contract and the DFSG
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > 3. supports the decision of the Release Team to require works such
> > as
> > images, video, and fonts to be licensed in compliance with the DFSG without
> > requiring source code for these works under DFSG #2; and
>
> 4. determines t
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I propose the following amendment to Steve's proposal.
[...]
> 4. determines that as a special exception to DFSG #2, the source code
> for device firmwares contained in the kernel packages will not be
> required as long as there are no other tech
Hi,
> I propose the following amendment to Steve's proposal.
>
> > THE DEBIAN PROJECT therefore,
> >
> > 1. reaffirms its dedication to providing a 100% free system to our
> > users according to our Social Contract and the DFSG; and
> >
> > 2. encourages authors of all works to
Le sam 26 août 2006 11:37, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
> I propose the following amendment to Steve's proposal.
>
> > THE DEBIAN PROJECT therefore,
> >
> > 1. reaffirms its dedication to providing a 100% free system
> > to our users according to our Social Contract and the DFSG; and
> >
> >
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >Rationale: most of us want to release etch ASAP, and most of us want to
>> >remove the firmwares from the kernel ASAP. This is a way that shouldn't
>> This is false: most of us do not mind at all distributing sourceless
>> (or even not modifiable) firmwares in the kern
On Sat, Aug 26, 2006 at 11:50:11AM +0200, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> >Rationale: most of us want to release etch ASAP, and most of us want to
> >remove the firmwares from the kernel ASAP. This is a way that shouldn't
> This is false: most of us do not mind at all distributing sourceless
> (or even not m
Le samedi 26 août 2006 à 11:50 +0200, Marco d'Itri a écrit :
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >Rationale: most of us want to release etch ASAP, and most of us want to
> >remove the firmwares from the kernel ASAP. This is a way that shouldn't
> This is false: most of us do not mind at all distributin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Rationale: most of us want to release etch ASAP, and most of us want to
>remove the firmwares from the kernel ASAP. This is a way that shouldn't
This is false: most of us do not mind at all distributing sourceless
(or even not modifiable) firmwares in the kernel packages.
I propose the following amendment to Steve's proposal.
> THE DEBIAN PROJECT therefore,
>
> 1. reaffirms its dedication to providing a 100% free system to our
> users according to our Social Contract and the DFSG; and
>
> 2. encourages authors of all works to make those works avai
22 matches
Mail list logo