Re: Amendment: Enhance requirements for General resolutions

2009-03-26 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009, Neil McGovern wrote: > Thanks for bringing this GR. I'd like to propose an amendment: > > AMENDMENT START > > General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian > Project. Yet, in a project

Re: Amendment: Enhance requirements for General resolutions

2009-03-26 Thread Peter Palfrader
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > PROPOSAL START > > General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian > Project. Yet, in a project the size of Debian, the current requirements > to initiate one are t

Re: Amendment: Enhance requirements for General resolutions

2009-03-25 Thread Russ Allbery
Joerg Jaspert writes: > PROPOSAL START > > General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian > Project. Yet, in a project the size of Debian, the current requirements > to initiate one are too small. > > There

Re: Amendment: Enhance requirements for General resolutions

2009-03-24 Thread Colin Tuckley
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Joerg Jaspert wrote: > and here is the promised amendment which will require a maximum of > floor(Q) developers to second a GR. > > PROPOSAL START > > General Resolutions are an

Re: Amendment: Enhance requirements for General resolutions

2009-03-23 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 03:49:02PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: >Hi, > >and here is the promised amendment which will require a maximum of >floor(Q) developers to second a GR. > >PROPOSAL START > >General Resolutions are an impo

Re: Amendment: Enhance requirements for General resolutions

2009-03-22 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 10:35:32PM -0300, Martín Ferrari wrote: > On Sat, 2009-03-21 at 15:49 +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > > > > PROPOSAL START > > > > General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian > > Pr

Re: Amendment: Enhance requirements for General resolutions

2009-03-22 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 11697 March 1977, Neil McGovern wrote: > AMENDMENT START > > General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian > Project. Yet, in a project the size of Debian, the current requirements > to initiate one are

Amendment: Enhance requirements for General resolutions

2009-03-22 Thread Neil McGovern
Hi, Thanks for bringing this GR. I'd like to propose an amendment: AMENDMENT START General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian Project. Yet, in a project the size of Debian, the current requirements to i

Re: Amendment: Enhance requirements for General resolutions

2009-03-21 Thread Martín Ferrari
On Sat, 2009-03-21 at 15:49 +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > PROPOSAL START > > General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian > Project. Yet, in a project the size of Debian, the current requirements > to ini

Re: Amendment: Enhance requirements for General resolutions

2009-03-21 Thread Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
Hi! Joerg Jaspert schrieb: > PROPOSAL START > > General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian > Project. Yet, in a project the size of Debian, the current requirements > to initiate one are too small. > >

Re: Amendment: Enhance requirements for General resolutions

2009-03-21 Thread Patrick Schoenfeld
Hi, On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 03:49:02PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > PROPOSAL START > > General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian > Project. Yet, in a project the size of Debian, the current requirement

Re: Amendment: Enhance requirements for General resolutions

2009-03-21 Thread Bernd Zeimetz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Joerg Jaspert wrote: > Hi, > > and here is the promised amendment which will require a maximum of > floor(Q) developers to second a GR. > > PROPOSAL START > > General Resolution

Re: Amendment: Enhance requirements for General resolutions

2009-03-21 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 12:04:31AM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit : > Le Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 03:49:02PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert a écrit : > > b) Delaying a decision of a Delegate or the DPL [§4.2(2.2)], > > as well as resolutions against a shortening of discussion/voting > > period or to over

Re: Amendment: Enhance requirements for General resolutions

2009-03-21 Thread Charles Plessy
Le Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 03:49:02PM +0100, Joerg Jaspert a écrit : > b) Delaying a decision of a Delegate or the DPL [§4.2(2.2)], > as well as resolutions against a shortening of discussion/voting > period or to overwrite a TC decision [§4.2(2.3)] requires floor(Q) > developers to spons

Re: Amendment: Enhance requirements for General resolutions

2009-03-21 Thread Matthew Johnson
On Sat Mar 21 15:49, Joerg Jaspert wrote: > PROPOSAL START > > General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian > Project. Yet, in a project the size of Debian, the current requirements > to initiate one are

Amendment: Enhance requirements for General resolutions

2009-03-21 Thread Joerg Jaspert
Hi, and here is the promised amendment which will require a maximum of floor(Q) developers to second a GR. PROPOSAL START General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian Project. Yet, in a project the size o