Hi Ian,
On 13/03/14 at 16:11 +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Contrary to what Lars says, I think there is a clear difference
> between these two approaches. ISTM that Lucas is much more "hands-on"
> and (for example) and takes much more of a close interest in the
> processes adopted by teams, than Ne
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 04:11:27PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Contrary to what Lars says, I think there is a clear difference
> between these two approaches. ISTM that Lucas is much more "hands-on"
> and (for example) and takes much more of a close interest in the
> processes adopted by teams, th
Lucas Nussbaum writes ("Re: All DPL candidates: level of team management"):
> Unfortunately, [the constitution] prevents delegations that document
> processes, [...]
>
> I think that the best solution here is a compromise solution: continue to
> document the te
Hi Lars,
Thanks for kicking off the questions this year!
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 08:49:41PM +, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> For all DPL candidates:
>
> We have a number of delegated teams. How detailed should the
> delegations be?
I've written my view of the constitution in quite a detailed post
Hi,
On 11/03/14 at 20:49 +, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> For all DPL candidates:
>
> We have a number of delegated teams. How detailed should the
> delegations be?
I think that delegations are a good tool to provide a clear status of
teams, in terms of active people, of powers that are delegated,
For all DPL candidates:
We have a number of delegated teams. How detailed should the
delegations be? What is the appropriate level of oversight,
management, and control that the DPL and the project in general should
have for deciding what the teams work on, and how they do their job?
--
http://w
6 matches
Mail list logo
