Re: All DPL candidates: Debian assets

2014-03-30 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 07:55:54PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote: > On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 01:03:31PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Do you think it's appropriate for these organizers to use Debian's name in > > seeking local sponsorship without consulting the DPL? > Sorry for not being clearer, b

Re: All DPL candidates: Debian assets

2014-03-30 Thread Neil McGovern
Hi Steve, On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 01:03:31PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > Do you think it's appropriate for these organizers to use Debian's name in > seeking local sponsorship without consulting the DPL? > Sorry for not being clearer, but no. I think that a central repository and/or sponsors

Re: All DPL candidates: Debian assets

2014-03-28 Thread Neil McGovern
Hi Steve, On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 12:57:11AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > (To both) What kinds of unexpected expenses do you think Debian should keep > funds available to cover? What do you think is the appropriate level of > cash reserves for the project to hold, and why? > Basically, machin

Re: All DPL candidates: Debian assets

2014-03-28 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On Friday 21 March 2014 17:48:02 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: [snip] > Generally, my impression is that many Debian contributors do not fancy > travelling that much, or are just too busy, and thus don't really like > to attend too many such events. While I recognize that - I don't know many DDs in pers

Re: All DPL candidates: Debian assets

2014-03-27 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Neil, On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 06:44:24PM +, Neil McGovern wrote: > On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 04:02:57PM +, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 10:44:07PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote: > > > At the moment, in just SPI, we have > 100k USD awaiting being spent. > > > As an indica

Re: All DPL candidates: Debian assets

2014-03-27 Thread Neil McGovern
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 04:02:57PM +, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 10:44:07PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote: > > At the moment, in just SPI, we have > 100k USD awaiting being spent. > > As an indication, that’s enough for a DebConf without any sponsors! > > Our donations should

Re: All DPL candidates: Debian assets

2014-03-25 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi Steve, On 25/03/14 at 00:57 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: > (To Lucas) Why should Debian need to hold a reserve with its TOs to fully > fund a DebConf for which fundraising has failed? I believe the operating > principle is that the DebConf organization should never spend money that it > doesn'

Re: All DPL candidates: Debian assets

2014-03-25 Thread Steve Langasek
Hi Lucas, Since I am one of the local organizers this year for DebConf, which is Debian's single largest annual expense; and in light of the ongoing discussion you and I are having about DebConf budgeting; it should be no surprise that I have opinions on the question of Debian asset management. ;)

Re: All DPL candidates: Debian assets

2014-03-21 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
On 20/03/14 at 22:44 +0100, Neil McGovern wrote: > I don’t think there’s an “if” here. Ever since I was secretary of SPI, > I’ve been concerned about the amount of money that Debian has > earmarked. Again, I disagree with Lucas here - I don’t think that > saving donors money is a good plan, our don

Re: All DPL candidates: Debian assets

2014-03-21 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi Lars, On 21/03/14 at 16:02 +, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 10:44:07PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote: > > At the moment, in just SPI, we have > 100k USD awaiting being spent. > > As an indication, that’s enough for a DebConf without any sponsors! > > Our donations should be s

Re: All DPL candidates: Debian assets

2014-03-21 Thread Lars Wirzenius
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 10:44:07PM +0100, Neil McGovern wrote: > At the moment, in just SPI, we have > 100k USD awaiting being spent. > As an indication, that’s enough for a DebConf without any sponsors! > Our donations should be spent. Be that better porter boxes, or a > better backup service, or

Re: All DPL candidates: Debian assets

2014-03-21 Thread Neil McGovern
Hi Hector, On 14 Mar 2014, at 13:25, Hector Oron wrote: > Hello DPL candidates, > > First of all congratulations for your nominations. I have several > questions for you, I hope you do not mind to reply: Thanks for your question, it’s good to see a DSA member engaging with the election :) >

Re: All DPL candidates: Debian assets

2014-03-14 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Hi Hector, On 14/03/14 at 13:25 +0100, Hector Oron wrote: > a. Debian hardware infrastructure > 0. What do you think of Debian teams owning their own > infrastructure (hardware)? First, generally, I think that one big risk for Debian is fragmentation into smaller, team-sized sub-projects.

All DPL candidates: Debian assets

2014-03-14 Thread Hector Oron
Hello DPL candidates, First of all congratulations for your nominations. I have several questions for you, I hope you do not mind to reply: a. Debian hardware infrastructure 0. What do you think of Debian teams owning their own infrastructure (hardware)? 1. If Debian team gets har