Gunnar Wolf writes:
> However, this topic does raise a question: Knowledge transfer. I might
> be arguing on something marginally related to the vote at hand, but
> anyway, when delegations shift (be it due to burnout, retirement,
> rotation or whatever), we should make it as easy as possible to
I thought I'd answered everything again, but then I made the mistake of
mentioning Charles's post to Gunnar
Which reminds me: please tell me if I've missed a question on this list
during the campaign period that you were hoping for me to answer.
On 2013-03-28 22:36, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
How
On 2013-03-28 21:54, Charles Plessy wrote:
what you wrote here presents the end of a delegation as a final
point.
However, I was very interested by your use of "rotation", which I was
understanding as a faster turnover where the responsibility of the
delegation
is passed through developers acco
Charles Plessy dijo [Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 12:54:24PM +0900]:
> Hi Moray,
>
> what you wrote here presents the end of a delegation as a final point.
> However, I was very interested by your use of "rotation", which I was
> understanding as a faster turnover where the responsibility of the delegatio
Le Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 08:46:28PM -0600, Moray Allan a écrit :
>
> Stepping down should be seen as a sign of accomplishment. It should
> not be seen as losing the ability to provide advice. It should be
> seen as an opportunity for someone to use their skills in other
> aspects of the project,
On 2013-03-25 10:24, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
In his platform, Moray writes:
| I would also like us to take a more pre-emptive approach to such
issues
| by encouraging more turnover of members between different teams
I think that most teams require quite specific skills, and most team
members lik
On 2013-03-25 09:55, Thomas Goirand wrote:
One of the key role of the DPL is to delegate.
What are your intention in this regard? Do you think that the current
teams and roles are well filled? Or would you like to change some of
the
people currently holding a position? Why (not) changing anyth
Thomas Goirand writes:
> On 03/26/2013 09:28 PM, Gergely Nagy wrote:
>> I see
>> Zack's DPL helpers initiative as a step in this direction, and I'd like
>> to take it a little further.
>
> How? Make it formal? Have new "official" positions? Or just push more
> people to help and that's it (which
On 03/26/2013 09:28 PM, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> I see
> Zack's DPL helpers initiative as a step in this direction, and I'd like
> to take it a little further.
How? Make it formal? Have new "official" positions? Or just push more
people to help and that's it (which is ok too...)?
Thomas
--
To UNS
Thomas Goirand writes:
> One of the key role of the DPL is to delegate.
>
> What are your intention in this regard? Do you think that the current
> teams and roles are well filled? Or would you like to change some of the
> people currently holding a position? Why (not) changing anything?
I belie
On 25/03/13 at 23:55 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> One of the key role of the DPL is to delegate.
>
> What are your intention in this regard? Do you think that the current
> teams and roles are well filled? Or would you like to change some of the
> people currently holding a position
Hi all,
One of the key role of the DPL is to delegate.
What are your intention in this regard? Do you think that the current
teams and roles are well filled? Or would you like to change some of the
people currently holding a position? Why (not) changing anything?
Cheers,
Thomas
P.S: I have rea
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 08:47:16PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> As you might have noted, the Constitution does not spell out the
> process how a new delegation is made. Would you please summarize the
> process you intend to follow if you are elected? Thanks.
For tasks not currently under anyon
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 08:47:16PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
>As you might have noted, the Constitution does not spell out the
>process how a new delegation is made. Would you please summarize the
>process you intend to follow if you are elected? Thanks.
A few steps:
1. Talk to the current
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 09:27:24AM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> su, 2006-03-12 kello 11:21 +1000, Anthony Towns kirjoitti:
> > if a delegation is necessary, make it, by posting the
> > details to -project, or if necessary, -private.
> Why -project and not -devel-announce?
I just wasn't assuming
su, 2006-03-12 kello 11:21 +1000, Anthony Towns kirjoitti:
> if a delegation is necessary, make it, by posting the
> details to -project, or if necessary, -private.
Why -project and not -devel-announce?
--
Policy is your friend. Trust the Policy. Love the Policy. Obey the
Policy.
--
To UNSUBS
Andreas Schuldei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First of all, I will delegate only people if they are ready for
> it. As some example, if e.g. the policy team asks me to extend
> themself by someone, I will (usually) do as requested.
If this is the case, why were you supporting a motion to forcibl
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 08:47:16PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> As you might have noted, the Constitution does not spell out the
> process how a new delegation is made. Would you please summarize the
> process you intend to follow if you are elected? Thanks.
See also http://lists.debian.org/de
Hi,
* Florian Weimer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060311 20:48]:
> As you might have noted, the Constitution does not spell out the
> process how a new delegation is made. Would you please summarize the
> process you intend to follow if you are elected? Thanks.
Well, there are two parts of the answer.
As you might have noted, the Constitution does not spell out the
process how a new delegation is made. Would you please summarize the
process you intend to follow if you are elected? Thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
20 matches
Mail list logo
