> Here is the text:
>
> ---
>
> The Debian project asks its members to be considerate when proposing General
> Resolutions, as the GR process may be disruptive regardless of the outcome =
> of
> the vote.
>
> Regarding the sub
Hi,
On Dienstag, 21. Oktober 2014, Sam Hartman wrote:
> my response is "so what? People are doing their jobs, let's not get in
> their way."
> I'd rather this amendment not push people away simply because they
> disagree over whether all the questions have been answered.
I agree. I've also been
> "Charles" == Charles Plessy writes:
Charles> Thanks Anthony and Lucas for your suggestions. Even if it
Charles> can be improved, I am reluctant to change the wording of
Charles> the amendement, given that the whole point is a) to say
Charles> that a GR is unwelcome, and b)
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 11:29:21PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> ---
>
> The Debian project asks its members to be considerate when proposing General
> Resolutions, as the GR process may be disruptive regardless of the outcom
Thanks Anthony and Lucas for your suggestions.
Even if it can be improved, I am reluctant to change the wording of the
amendement, given that the whole point is a) to say that a GR is unwelcome, and
b) to reduce as much as possible the “attack surface” on the voted text in case
some people want to
On 20/10/14 at 08:06 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 05:01:02PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > The Debian project asks its members to be considerate when proposing
> > > Ge
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 08:06:28AM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 05:01:02PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum a ??crit :
> > I think that it would be very helpful to describe how "the question has
> > already been resolved". My understanding is that the various proposals
> > add policy
> "Joey" == Joey Hess writes:
Joey> Charles Plessy wrote:
>>
---
>>
>> The Debian project asks its members to be considerate when
>> proposing General Resolutions, as the GR process may be
>> dis
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 11:29:21PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Anyway, whichever the name I call for seconds (or comments: if this proposed
> amendment is considered harmful, let me know).
>
Received (well, found in the middle of a mail thread, thanks for
changing the subject though :P) and va
Charles Plessy wrote:
> ---
>
> The Debian project asks its members to be considerate when proposing General
> Resolutions, as the GR process may be disruptive regardless of the outcome of
> the vote.
>
> Regarding the subjec
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 11:29:21PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Here is the text:
>
> ---
>
> The Debian project asks its members to be considerate when proposing General
> Resolutions, as the GR process may be disruptive r
Charles Plessy (2014-10-19):
> ---
>
> The Debian project asks its members to be considerate when proposing General
> Resolutions, as the GR process may be disruptive regardless of the outcome of
> the vote.
>
> Regarding th
Charles Plessy writes:
> Here is the text:
>
> ---
>
> The Debian project asks its members to be considerate when proposing General
> Resolutions, as the GR process may be disruptive regardless of the outcome of
> the vote.
>
On Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 11:29:21PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> ---
>
> The Debian project asks its members to be considerate when proposing General
> Resolutions, as the GR process may be disruptive regardless of the outcom
On Sun, 19 Oct 2014, Charles Plessy wrote:
> ---
>
> The Debian project asks its members to be considerate when proposing General
> Resolutions, as the GR process may be disruptive regardless of the outcome of
> the vote.
>
>
Le dimanche, 19 octobre 2014, 23.29:21 Charles Plessy a écrit :
> --
>
> The Debian project asks its members to be considerate when proposing
> General Resolutions, as the GR process may be disruptive regardless
> of the outcome o
Hi,
On Sonntag, 19. Oktober 2014, Charles Plessy wrote:
> ---
>
> The Debian project asks its members to be considerate when proposing
> General Resolutions, as the GR process may be disruptive regardless of the
> outcome of
Le Sun, Oct 19, 2014 at 05:01:02PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum a écrit :
> >
> > ---
> >
> > The Debian project asks its members to be considerate when proposing General
> > Resolutions, as the GR process may be disruptive regardle
Hi,
Charles Plessy:
> ---
>
> The Debian project asks its members to be considerate when proposing General
> Resolutions, as the GR process may be disruptive regardless of the outcome of
> the vote.
>
> Regarding the subject
Hi Charles,
On 19/10/14 at 23:29 +0900, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 05:31:28PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs a écrit :
> >
> > Charles Plessy:
> > > This is why I am proposing this amendement, to say: “this GR was a bad
> > > idea,
> > > please do not do it again”.
> > >
> > I wou
Le Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 05:31:28PM +0200, Matthias Urlichs a écrit :
>
> Charles Plessy:
> > This is why I am proposing this amendement, to say: “this GR was a bad idea,
> > please do not do it again”.
> >
> I would not regard it as an amendment, but as a separate alternative option
> on the ball
21 matches
Mail list logo
