I want to thank everyone for their patience as we migrate to the new
DFSG-free software and away from the old software. The license on the old
software, while "probably free" doesn't give explicit permission and so was
not up to Debian's standards. In the mean time, Thank you Joey for
(indirectly
This is the third an final ballot. If you have already voted, there is no
need to vote again unless you wish to change your vote. If you have not
voted yet, this is the last ballot I will be sending to the lists.
--
On Thu, Mar 02, 2000 at 04:47:35PM -0300, Lalo Martins wrote:
> (sorry for cross-posting to -devel-announce, but I think the
> answer to this is important enought to be posted there)
>
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2000 at 06:40:53PM -, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
> > For anyone who might have misunde
(sorry for cross-posting to -devel-announce, but I think the
answer to this is important enought to be posted there)
On Thu, Mar 02, 2000 at 06:40:53PM -, Debian Project Secretary wrote:
> For anyone who might have misunderstood the last ballot. The election has
> started. Please vote. The
For anyone who might have misunderstood the last ballot. The election has
started. Please vote. The last ballot was sent to the appropriate lists
and was not recalled. Even with typos in the introduction, the ballot (the
part between the "dont' delete" lines) was valid.
---
Previously Darren O. Benham wrote:
> heck if I know.. I just woke up one night with a bright light shining in my
> eyes telling me that I had to add three hidden options to the ballot and if
> I didn't, my cat would not suffer any accidents...
Hmm, I pity your cat.
Wichert.
--
__
On Thu, Feb 24, 2000 at 10:39:31PM +0100, Richard Braakman wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2000 at 05:14:29PM +, Jules Bean wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 24, 2000 at 08:40:38AM -0800, Darren O. Benham wrote:
> > > Ballot #1 was a test ballot... and should have been reset.
> >
> > Like hell it was..
> >
> >
> 8? There are 5 choices :)
>
> Who are the hidden 3 candidates?
Ian Murdock, Bruce Perens, Ian Jackson. :p
Will
--
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PR
On Thu, Feb 24, 2000 at 05:14:29PM +, Jules Bean wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2000 at 08:40:38AM -0800, Darren O. Benham wrote:
> > Ballot #1 was a test ballot... and should have been reset.
>
> Like hell it was..
>
> Ballot #1 was the cabal ballot where you chose the new leader. Ballot 2 is
> t
On Thu, Feb 24, 2000 at 08:40:38AM -0800, Darren O. Benham wrote:
> Ballot #1 was a test ballot... and should have been reset.
Like hell it was..
Ballot #1 was the cabal ballot where you chose the new leader. Ballot 2 is
the fake one to keep us all tamed.
black helicopters overhead
;)
--
Ju
On Thu, Feb 24, 2000 at 01:08:58PM +0100, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> Previously Debian Project Secretary wrote:
> > CALL FOR VOTES
> > (2 of 2)
>
> `2 of 2' ?
Ballot #1 was a test ballot... and should have been reset.
Heck, I'm thinking we need th
CALL FOR VOTES
(2 of 2)
Votes must be received by 23:59:59 UTC Mar 9, 2000
This vote is being conducted as required by the Debian Constitution. For
voting questions only contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
HOW TO VOTE
Do not erase anything between t
12 matches
Mail list logo
