On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 07:07:03PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 01:12:45AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:42:40PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > > Hello developers,
> > >
> > > I am hereby proposing the amendement below to the General resolutio
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 01:12:45AM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:42:40PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> > Hello developers,
> >
> > I am hereby proposing the amendement below to the General resolution
> > entitled "Enhance requirements for General resolutions".
> >
> >
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:42:40PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Hello developers,
>
> I am hereby proposing the amendement below to the General resolution
> entitled "Enhance requirements for General resolutions".
>
> PROPOSAL START
>
* Kurt Roeckx [Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:52:22 +0100]:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 08:03:46PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > I'd also like to complain about the title text of the initial GR. It is
> > clearly manipulative, as it pretends to be merely describing the proposed
> > changes when in fact it
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> What about:
> General Resolution sponsorship requirements
sounds like package sponsorship requirements to me. therefore i suggest
to be extra clear and change it to 'Requirements for General Resolution
Sponsorship'.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Burgunderstrasse 3, CH-4
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 11:52:22PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 08:03:46PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> >
> > I'd also like to complain about the title text of the initial GR. It is
> > clearly manipulative, as it pretends to be merely describing the proposed
> > changes w
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 08:03:46PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
>
> I'd also like to complain about the title text of the initial GR. It is
> clearly manipulative, as it pretends to be merely describing the proposed
> changes when in fact it is asserting an opinion. I hope the Secretary
> will fi
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 08:03:46PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> I'd also like to complain about the title text of the initial GR. It is
> clearly manipulative, as it pretends to be merely describing the proposed
> changes when in fact it is asserting an opinion. I hope the Secretary
> will fix t
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:42:40PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Hello developers,
>
> I am hereby proposing the amendement below to the General resolution
> entitled "Enhance requirements for General resolutions".
>
> PROPOSAL START
>
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 04:44:18PM -0700, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 24/03/09 at 00:29 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> > > PROPOSAL START
> > > ===
> > > General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian
> > > Project, whi
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 11:42:40PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote:
> Hello developers,
> I am hereby proposing the amendement below to the General resolution
> entitled "Enhance requirements for General resolutions".
> PROPOSAL START
>
On 24/03/09 at 00:29 +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
> > PROPOSAL START
> > ===
> > General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian
> > Project, which have served us well since the first GR vote in 2003,
> > with 804 devel
> PROPOSAL START
> ===
> General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian
> Project, which have served us well since the first GR vote in 2003,
> with 804 developers, nearly has much as today slightly over 1000
> de
(Dropping -devel…)
Bill Allombert (23/03/2009):
> Hello developers,
>
> I am hereby proposing the amendement below to the General resolution
> entitled "Enhance requirements for General resolutions".
>
> PROPOSAL START
>
>
Hello developers,
I am hereby proposing the amendement below to the General resolution
entitled "Enhance requirements for General resolutions".
PROPOSAL START
General Resolutions are an important framework within the Debian
15 matches
Mail list logo
