y considered one of
these sources.
But as I said, these are not things we can easily solve by spending
money.
Zephaniah E. Hull.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:26:53AM +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 02:28:21AM -0400, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 25,
ane, but.)
Now, the issues with stuff embedded into credit card terminals or ATMs
gets a lot nastier. Most of that goes into the hardware side, but I
have not had to go through a PCI audit on those, so I'm not sure what
all is involved.
Zephaniah E. Hull.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 07:10:43PM -0800, Ted Walther wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 07:57:15PM -0500, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> >During the debate you made a number of assertions about a number of
> >others running for DPL, specificly alleging that you had specific
> >
examples in question in
context wherever possible.
Thank you.
Zephaniah E. Hull.
Debian Developer.
--
1024D/E65A7801 Zephaniah E. Hull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
92ED 94E4 B1E6 3624 226D 5727 4453 008B E65A 7801
CCs of replies from mailing lists are requested.
*
documentation
> to be software. difficult trick that, to simultaneously believe that
> something is and is not at the same time.
>
>
> the DFSG is *Guidelines*, not *Rules*. Loony Literal Fundamentalists
> need to remember that and take a reality check before commenting.
>
--->8-------
>
> --
> Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
> Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
>
> Ara que ets la meva dona, te la fotré fins a la melsa, bacona!
>
inutes.
Hell, for 5 seconds.
Read what the Debian project has ALREADY DECIDED on the matter, then
give us a reason why a 'secondary section' is somehow special and should
be exempt from the DFSG.
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 10:03:26AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at
On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 07:10:07PM +0200, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Feb 2006 16:37:20 +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
>
> > "Zephaniah E. Hull" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> So, I write a program, nice, big, with a license that says that you ca
On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 11:31:38AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 05:55:54PM -0500, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> i challenge any of you zealots to come up with a REAL WORLD, PRACTICAL
> proof that the GFDL is non-free (and i mean actually non-free, not
> merely
On Mon, Feb 06, 2006 at 09:34:19AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 05, 2006 at 08:47:54AM -0500, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote:
> > I am unconvinced that the DFSG means 'all modifications', I think that
> > it really does mean all reasonable modifications.
> &g
in contrib or non-free instead of
main?
(Yes, I'm aware of the argument that the license breaks if the invariant
sections are no longer secondary, if you invoke that in the argument I
will read it as stating that I am also not free to remove the
non-invariant portions of my choo
alternatives for the management software
should be considered before the sourceforge model is adopted.
2: 1.9 CVS repository for debian directories
I think I can fit this to one very very simple question.
Have you ever used CVS for any length of time with others?
Zephaniah E. Hull
other alternatives for the management software
should be considered before the sourceforge model is adopted.
2: 1.9 CVS repository for debian directories
I think I can fit this to one very very simple question.
Have you ever used CVS for any length of time with others?
Zephaniah E. Hull
rain from flaming the candidates.
Why should he?
The candidate in question seems to have no problems flaming everyone
himself.
Zephaniah E. Hull.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Raul
--
PGP EA5198D1-Zephaniah E. Hull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>-GPG E65A7801
Keys available at ht
rain from flaming the candidates.
Why should he?
The candidate in question seems to have no problems flaming everyone
himself.
Zephaniah E. Hull.
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Raul
--
PGP EA5198D1-Zephaniah E. Hull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>-GPG E65A7801
Keys available at ht
DWN,
that after all the flames and bickering there is finally something for
people to second which would resolve this whole mess.
That being said, consider this an official second of the proposal
below, this message is gpg signed with my key.
Zephaniah E. Hull.
>
> I hadn't proposed a fu
DWN,
that after all the flames and bickering there is finally something for
people to second which would resolve this whole mess.
That being said, consider this an official second of the proposal
below, this message is gpg signed with my key.
Zephaniah E. Hull.
>
> I hadn't proposed a fu
I also second this amendment, as it is now clear that it is indeed an
amendment..
This message is gpg signed..
Zephaniah E. Hull..
On Sun, Jun 11, 2000 at 02:05:15AM +0200, Carsten Leonhardt wrote:
> Anthony Towns writes:
>
> > I wish to propose an ammendment to the proposed r
I also second this amendment, as it is now clear that it is indeed an
amendment..
This message is gpg signed..
Zephaniah E. Hull..
On Sun, Jun 11, 2000 at 02:05:15AM +0200, Carsten Leonhardt wrote:
> Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I wish to propose an
feel like doing them, not
> because we all voted and told some poor sod that they've been elected
> to do the job.
Also agreed, the problem coming when someone says that they are doing
something, and does not do it...
And in most cases even that is fine, however when it comes to
/ess
20 matches
Mail list logo
