Re: Alternative proposal: support for alternative init systems is desirable but not mandatory

Hi, On 17/10/14 12:44 AM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > Hi, > > It is now clear that we will have a vote on this issue. I think that we > should use this opportunity to clarify the Project's position, and that's > not something that would be achieved if "Further Discussion" were to > win. > > I am the

Re: [to all candidates] Accessible software in Debian

On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 4:37 AM, Mario Lang wrote: > Hi. > > To make a rather complicated and long story short: Accessibility of > graphical user interfaces in Debian has taken a slight step backward > with the GNOME 3 rewrite. Squeeze was more stable regarding this. [snip] Slightly off-topic, b

Re: Your opinion on Debian Maintainer status

Hi, Just throwing in my $0.02 as one of the ~200 DMs we have... On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Arno Töll wrote: > although I'm deliberately ignoring all the good reasons you provided, > JFTR, many people feel obliged to become DM these days before applying > as a DD and even many DDs understan

Re: [Soc-coordination] mentoring programs in Debian

On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > And I also think that in terms of internship programs (=~ "full-time > work inside the project during the summer"), we should explore joining > other programs and/or creating our own. If there's anything that I hope to see happen from this