On 2022-08-23 10:39, Simon Josefsson wrote:
Therefor we will not include any non-free software in Debian, nor in the
main archive or installer/live/cloud or other official images, and will
not enable anything from non-free or contrib by default.
The initial proposition was also pushing a new n
On 2022-08-23 22:22, Bart Martens wrote:
Debian would recommend the one with non-free-firmware, for the
purposes of enabling users to install on current hardware, but both
would be available.
Do we need to recommend one above the other? I'd rather use some short
explanation per installer to he
On 2022-08-23 18:50, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
I would find it problematic if the official way to install Debian
*required* a non-DFSG image.
would you also find it problematic if there were *two* official
images, a "free one" (as we know it) and a "free one plus firmwares"?
As I laid out my r
On 2022-08-22 22:13, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
So there may be some unintended consequences where new users may
associate "100% free software" with "not functional" and "induces pain
and frustration", such that it might end up *hurting* the cause of
free software.
Well, that's the truth when it com
On 2022-08-20 21:49, Bart Martens wrote:
3) Ensure that the filename of the installation media includes
"non-free-firmware" or something similar so that it is clear to
everyone what they are getting into. Debian has had such a long
history of not including non-free bits in the ins
On 6/19/22 01:43, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote:
Text of GR
Donations to the Debian project of assets other than the TO's currency
of choice should be liquidated as soon as possible.
End Text of GR
What's a TO?
❦ 18 octobre 2014 12:21 +0200, Luca Falavigna :
> Dear fellow Developers,
>
> I would like to propose the following amendment proposal,
> and I hereby call for seconds.
>
>
>
> ** Begin Alternative Proposal **
[...]
Seconded.
--
Format a program to help the reader understand it.
-
❦ 16 octobre 2014 16:26 -0400, Paul Tagliamonte :
> Here, we will likely do invasive forks of major upstream software
> (GNOME) to get around a local requirement; do we expect the GNOME team
> to do this?
By turning such bugs into RC bugs, the proponents are exactly advocating
this position: th
OoO En cette nuit nuageuse du mercredi 27 juin 2007, vers 01:06, Paul
Cager <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> disait:
> I'm a fairly active (non-DD) member of the Java Packaging team, and I
> also maintain a couple of non-Java packages. Although I'm starting to
> become reasonably skilled at Java packaging,
9 matches
Mail list logo
