Re: Call for seconds: post-Lenny enforceability of DFSG violations

n-free stuff out of main, you need to act now or fact the same thing for squeeze that you did for lenny, etch, sarge, ...". Personally, I'd be more than happy to rip out portmap (solves more bugs that are long overdue, too!), but then I don't like to use it either. Kind regards

Proposed amendment: Resolving DFSG violations

cess of people that spoil my Debian experience. I am not quite ready to quit yet, but every day and every second on Robert's resolution help. -- Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Question for Gustavo and Sam: bringing back the fun

, you might have not have much opposition. Kind regards T. -- Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: GFDL position statement ballot invalid

on the judgement of the voters. The problem with the amendment has been pointed out very early[1], yet it received enough seconds and thus should be considered. I'm not sure the Secretary can do much about it. Kind regards T. 1. http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2006/01/msg00181.html -- Th

Re: GFDL position statement ballot invalid

bian-vote/2006/02/msg0.html 2. http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2006/02/msg6.html 3. I don't want to guess anyone's mind, it just looks like the emphasis on percieved "procedural mistakes" makes it impossible to exclude such a challenge. -- Thomas Viehmann, http: