Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been thinking about this proposal for some time, and I probably
> should have send this some time ago. At least some people seem to
> have had simular ideas, so I wonder why nobody propsed anything like
> this.
>
> The idea is to create a new section that contai
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
>
> > If it is the consensus of the project that sourceless firmware doesn't
> > belong in main, this is a conscious regression in DFSG-compliance relative
> > to sarge. I don't think that's acceptable. We obviously do have the
> > means to remove
Christian Perrier wrote:
[snip]
> This is spring time (at least for half of the world...and probably for
> 90% of Debian world)so take a break, go for a walk in the forest,
> hear the birds singing, get one day off with no mail reading...and
> remember this is all about a hobby for most of us.
Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi, Martin Schulze wrote:
>
> > Synchronising security updates for several *distributions* (i.e. different
> > source versions) is a pain. Sychronising for all architectures is quite
> > easy as long as our great buildd network is in good shape.
>
> There's one area whe
Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Angus Lees:
> > Erm, no. Many "metric compatible" fonts aren't exactly that way.
> > See http://www.pragma-ade.com/general/technotes/tfmetrics.pdf for an
> > interesting comparison of Palatino.
>
> With well-written documents, the worst problem probably is that
Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> On ?? 13 ?? 2005 18:28, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> > What's the compatible replacement for Times New Roman?
>
> Compatible in what way? Do you need just a serif font? Or do you need
> some serif font that looks exact
Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
> On ?? 13 ?? 2005 15:53, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> > - eclipse
> > - msttcorefonts
>
> I can't speak about the rest of this list, but kaffe is now able to
> run eclipse 3.0.1, which means that eclipse will sooner or later
> enter main.
7 matches
Mail list logo
