Re: Anton's amendment

2006-02-01 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Wed, Feb 01, 2006 at 06:32:25PM -0700, Wesley J. Landaker wrote: > Anyway, maybe you could give us an example format showing your point of view > and then if someone wants to show and alternate interpretation/point of > view, they can do it in a fashion that would be acceptable to you? Well,

Re: Statistical analysis of the DPL 2005 election

2005-05-09 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 02:42:54PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > I don't know the statistics; but if "factor" means something similar to > "vector basis", then I would've said it meant that "in choosing > rankings, people tended to rank AT independently of other candidates". This is my understan

Re: Denied vote and the definition of a DD

2005-03-19 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 11:56:32PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > a) Present me with a picture ID signed by a person in NM, of > the DAM, or the DPL, or K people whose keys are in the > keyring, AND Is there a reason why you one NM signature is as good as K DD signatures

Re: [followup question] Career path for non-maintainer DD's

2005-03-17 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 01:34:17PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > I think it would be fairly reasonable to let translators, documenters, > and other people who do good for work Debian, become Debian developers, > but only have those who pass a "packaging skills exam" (like T&S is > mostly now) have

Re: Questions to all DPL candidates

2005-03-13 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 02:42:05PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote: > Out of curiosity, which "important pieces of software" are hidden > by not mentioning or including non-free (and contrib)? Just a quick list of what some people might consider important or useful, yet is in contrib or non-free: - n

Re: DRAFT amendment to "Release sarge with amd64": "Freeze architecture support for sarge"

2004-07-13 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 01:45:56AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote: > Anyway, I'm likely to second the proposal that comes out of this draft. Just for the reference, I'm inclined to change it into something like "Debian reaffirms that the decision to include an architecture or not lies with the RM"...

DRAFT amendment to "Release sarge with amd64": "Freeze architecture support for sarge"

2004-07-13 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
The following is a draft for an amendment to the latest GR; I'd appreciate comments on it before eventually proposing it: === I hereby propose an amendment to the current GR proposal "Release sarge with amd64": The Debian project hereby resolves, That we will not include further architectur