> I propose we change section 5.2 of the constitution concerning appointment
> of the Project Leader to reduce the nomination period to a week, and the
> voting period to two weeks. In wdiff format:
>
> =
> 5.2. Appointment
>
> 1. The Project Leader is elected by the Developers.
> 2.
Hi mates
On Sat, 28 Jul 2007 07:32:02 pm Martin Schulze wrote:
> Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Holger Levsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070727 13:02]:
> > > Sure. But why shouldnt trusted non-DDs not be able to upload their
> > > teams packages? And a subscriber and active Debian Edu developer I
> > > thin
Hi aj
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 06:56:50 pm Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 04:05:57PM +0200, Steffen Joeris wrote:
> > I'd like to offer an alternative gr proposal. I read the whole thread
> > (took me most of the night :( ) and after some discussions on IRC, I c
Hi mate
> > (Note: If the NM applies for DD status, he can become a DM after FD
> > approval)
>
> Is "an NM process" different from "the NM process"?
>
> If the last item would require the applicant to apply for NM-ship and
> not be rejected from this process, it would help those in the NM process
Hi Steve
Sorry for the delay, I just arrived at College :(
> I see the following weaknesses in your proposal compared with AJ's:
>
> - Only people who are going through NM qualify. This reduces the set of
> maintainers benefitting from it to those who have the time, interest, and
> skill to
Hi mates
I'd like to offer an alternative gr proposal. I read the whole thread (took me
most of the night :( ) and after some discussions on IRC, I come up with this
proposal.
I took ajs proposal and modified it to fit my understanding of DM. See the
patch below the proposal, together with my
6 matches
Mail list logo
