* Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000331 12:23]:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 07:08:07PM -, Darren Benham wrote:
> > The ballots came from:
>
> 216 people, if I counted right (wc(1) :). So much for the `300 active
> developers' vaporware, even if you include dissidents et al...
Wouldn't this be
If I remember the text of the ballot, it asked for pgp keys. It said
nothing about gpg. Since I can't vote in the thing, I didn't email the
fellow running it, and ask about pgp/gpg. But I thought about it. :)
* John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000228 08:08]:
> What is up with this? Does "key" re
On Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 01:57:00PM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>
> On 25-Feb-2000 Ben Collins wrote:
> >> - Why would you be a better DPL than Wichert?
> >
> > I don't think I will be "better", I'll just be very "different" :P
> >
> > PS: I hope this was confrontational enough
Edward, I can understand your frustration at these various places, but it
seems that asking for a 3:1 majority is similar to "we don't ever want this
to happen, but lets look like we should allow it."
Perhaps if the ratio were to be lower, 2:1, or replaced with "consensus"
which appears in other p
4 matches
Mail list logo
