-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 21 February 2004 15:50, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> On Saturday 21 February 2004 07:48, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > I propose that the Debian p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 21 February 2004 15:50, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> On Saturday 21 February 2004 07:48, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > I propose that the Debian p
On Saturday 21 February 2004 07:48, Anthony Towns wrote:
> I propose that the Debian project resolve that:
>
> ==
> Acknowledging that some of our users continue to require the use of
> programs that don't conform to the Debian Fre
On Saturday 21 February 2004 07:48, Anthony Towns wrote:
> I propose that the Debian project resolve that:
>
> ==
> Acknowledging that some of our users continue to require the use of
> programs that don't conform to the Debian Fre
On Thursday 17 October 2002 12:19, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Well, manoj, the only problem is that when you filter spam, you do it
> >> after having paid for the download of the spam over a possibly slow and
> >
On Thursday 17 October 2002 12:18, Jérôme Marant wrote:
>
> Sven mentioned that people with a poor network connection
> who have to download all the spam anyway. That is the real
> issue.
agreed. However I believe that by working on the spamassassin config the
amount of garbage delivered can be
On Thursday 17 October 2002 12:19, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> Well, manoj, the only problem is that when you filter spam, you do it
> >> after having paid for the download of the spam over a possibly slow and
> >
On Thursday 17 October 2002 12:18, Jérôme Marant wrote:
>
> Sven mentioned that people with a poor network connection
> who have to download all the spam anyway. That is the real
> issue.
agreed. However I believe that by working on the spamassassin config the
amount of garbage delivered can be
On Thursday 17 October 2002 09:00, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> >
> > now that all of the debian-* lists are being run through spamassassin
> > your
> > daily dose of canned meat should drop nicely.
>
> It does not work. What about those italian spams we received
> yesterday and today? If the debian serv
On Thursday 17 October 2002 09:00, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> >
> > now that all of the debian-* lists are being run through spamassassin
> > your
> > daily dose of canned meat should drop nicely.
>
> It does not work. What about those italian spams we received
> yesterday and today? If the debian serv
On Thursday 17 October 2002 02:33, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 01:06:51AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am against this proposal as well. W should not be making
> > things harder for legitimate users, treating them as acceptable
> > collateral damage in
On Thursday 17 October 2002 02:33, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 01:06:51AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am against this proposal as well. W should not be making
> > things harder for legitimate users, treating them as acceptable
> > collateral damage in
sorry for replying to the wrong list
> Draft. Comments welcome. Please Cc the list, not me.
>
> ===
>= Those who have in Debian the power to do so, will implement the following:
>
>
> To avoid spammers harvesting addresses fro
sorry for replying to the wrong list
> Draft. Comments welcome. Please Cc the list, not me.
>
> ===
>= Those who have in Debian the power to do so, will implement the following:
>
>
> To avoid spammers harvesting addresses fr
On 25-Feb-2000 Ben Collins wrote:
>> - Why would you be a better DPL than Wichert?
>
> I don't think I will be "better", I'll just be very "different" :P
>
> PS: I hope this was confrontational enough. I know how everyone feeds on
> flames and self-centered opinions. Maybe we should
>
> Anyway, the proposal was instead of having package declare
> itself to suggest , would have a "reverse suggests" that
> says it can enhance the functionality of . So, if you don't tell
> dselect (or whatever) about non-free, these suggests would never show
> up.
>
My understanding is that
16 matches
Mail list logo
