Re: Some questions for the DPL candidates

2001-03-07 Thread Sam TH
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 12:27:03AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 11:03:48PM -0600, Sam TH wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 10:31:00PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > mpg123MPEG layer 1/2/3 audio player > > > >

Re: Some questions for the DPL candidates

2001-03-07 Thread Sam TH
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 12:27:03AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 11:03:48PM -0600, Sam TH wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 10:31:00PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > mpg123MPEG layer 1/2/3 audio player > > > >

Re: Some questions for the DPL candidates

2001-03-06 Thread Sam TH
re restrictive license than some of the things in non-free). Really, I don't want to start a flamewar on this. But I don't think that trying to convince the W3C to relicense their specs is a worthwhile use of our time. sam th [EMAIL

Re: Some questions for the DPL candidates

2001-03-06 Thread Sam TH
re restrictive license than some of the things in non-free). Really, I don't want to start a flamewar on this. But I don't think that trying to convince the W3C to relicense their specs is a worthwhile use of our time. sam th [EMAIL

Re: my answers to questions

2001-03-06 Thread Sam TH
our word for that. I haven't done an analysis of non-free in quite a > while, so there may very well be some binary only packages. I had assumed > that we resolved such issues with installer programs, and that source is > certainly available. Netscape would be the ca

Re: my answers to questions

2001-03-06 Thread Sam TH
our word for that. I haven't done an analysis of non-free in quite a > while, so there may very well be some binary only packages. I had assumed > that we resolved such issues with installer programs, and that source is > certainly available. Netscape would be the ca