Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure

gmatic* support for an ideological position with not supporting that position at all... Please tell me if you can explain why this is not the case. |> |= -+- |= |> | |- | |- |\ Peter Eckersley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~pde for techno-leftie inspiration, take a look at http://www.computerbank.org.au/

Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure

gmatic* support for an ideological position with not supporting that position at all... Please tell me if you can explain why this is not the case. |> |= -+- |= |> | |- | |- |\ Peter Eckersley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~pde for techno-leftie inspiration, take a lo

Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure

ckages of non-free software, until the free alternatives are clearly *better*. |> |= -+- |= |> | |- | |- |\ Peter Eckersley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~pde for techno-leftie inspiration, take a look at http://www.computerbank.org.au/

Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure

ckages of non-free software, until the free alternatives are clearly *better*. |> |= -+- |= |> | |- | |- |\ Peter Eckersley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~pde for techno-leftie inspiration, take a look at http://www.computerbank.org.au/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, e

Re: [Election Results] Official and Final

't so bad"? Having been involved with numerous community organisations (some of which have very convenient electronic voting mechanisms), a 62.43% voter turnout is _extremely_ high. (lurking) |> |= -+- |= |> | |- | |- |\ Peter Eckersley ([EMAIL PROTECTED])