Re: General Resolution: Force AMD64 into Sarge

2004-07-20 Thread Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project Leader
* Clint Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-07-20 16:53]: > > > This is something where I would really like to see our leader step in > > > and get the communication straightened out, rather than voting, but I > He's specifying a particular way of handling "this": one that the > DPL does not appear to

Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates

2004-03-06 Thread Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project Leader
* Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-04 01:36]: > OK. Last I heard, irc.debian.org #debian is a project > resource. Here is an example of how women are treated in Debian; and > helix tells me that this is how they are treated all the time [...] > However, #debian on irc.deb

Re: Just a single Question for the Candidates

2004-03-06 Thread Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project Leader
* Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-04 01:36]: > OK. Last I heard, irc.debian.org #debian is a project > resource. Here is an example of how women are treated in Debian; and > helix tells me that this is how they are treated all the time [...] > However, #debian on irc.deb

Re: Questions to candidates - Debian/FSF discussions

2004-03-04 Thread Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project Leader
* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-03 17:13]: > > Has all this talking resulted in even an iota of concrete movement > > on the official FSF position? Have there been any real promises > > made that there is indeed going to be a change, from hte powers > > that be in the FSF? Is there anything solid

Re: Questions to candidates - Debian/FSF discussions

2004-03-04 Thread Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project Leader
* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-03-03 17:13]: > > Has all this talking resulted in even an iota of concrete movement > > on the official FSF position? Have there been any real promises > > made that there is indeed going to be a change, from hte powers > > that be in the FSF? Is there anything solid

Re: RFD: amendment of Debian Social Contract

2003-11-02 Thread Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project Leader
* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-31 13:16]: > Informally, it appears to be the exclusive domain of the Debian > Archive Administrators (who, the last time I checked, were not > official delegates of the Debian Project Leader[1]). Yes, ftpmaster is responsible for the archive and has

Re: RFD: amendment of Debian Social Contract

2003-11-02 Thread Martin Michlmayr - Debian Project Leader
* Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-31 13:16]: > Informally, it appears to be the exclusive domain of the Debian > Archive Administrators (who, the last time I checked, were not > official delegates of the Debian Project Leader[1]). Yes, ftpmaster is responsible for the archive and has