Re: Proposed GR: State exception for security bugs in Social Contract clause 3

2017-01-19 Thread Martin Bagge / brother
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2017-01-14 11:49, Ben Finney wrote: > Sean Whitton writes: > >> While I stand by my GR in principle, I agree with those who have >> said that it is not worth spending time on something like this >> unless it's going to pass without opposition. S

Re: Proposed GR: State exception for security bugs in Social Contract clause 3

2017-01-10 Thread Martin Bagge / brother
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 2017-01-10 07:49, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > I'm not opposed to amending the SC to say that security issues my > be kept private for a limited time, but I'm not sure it's worth > it. This. Hear hear. > I especially would like to avoid anything th

Re: Rationale for GRs

2011-03-11 Thread Martin Bagge / brother
On 2011-03-11 14:29, Martin Meredith wrote: > Won't this require a GR to put it into force? Probably. Is that in it self a problem? -- brother http://sis.bthstudent.se -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...