Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
On Sat 2021-11-06 11:32:35 +0100, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
Pierre-Elliott Bécue - 06.11.21, 11:06:58 CET:
That being said, the name is indeed outdated, and "Debian Archive
Team" sounds quite nice.
Agreed. I like this name.
Yes, please. "Debian Archive Team" is f
Hello,
Jonathan Carter wrote:
One of the reasons I like team-maintained packages is teams often have a
single packaging standard. Sadly, each team has their own way of doing
things and working in multiple teams means working with multiple
"standards".
If you were elected as DPL, what would you
Raphael Hertzog:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 01 Apr 2019, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote:
>>> So if i had to decide how to implement this technique, i think the
>>> simplest thing would be to move every
>>> https://salsa.debian.org/foo-team/libfoo to
>>> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/libfoo and let the de
Hi Alex,
Alexander Wirt:
>>> And I tested hyperkitty some time ago with our archive and it was
>>> unusable slow.
>>
>> Interesting. I wonder how Fedora deals with this. I haven't used their
>> archives extensively, but from quick tests it appeared to be quite
>> responsive.
>
> One question that
Hey all,
Do you have concrete plans to improve the mutual/two-way communication
between the DPL and the rest of the project? Monthly bits from the DPL
are already helpful, but they're mostly a one-way communication so far.
I don't mean private communication between the DPL and particular
teams/dev
Hi Alex,
Alexander Wirt:
> On Tue, 26 Mar 2019, Jonas Meurer wrote:
>> Alexander Wirt:
>>> In my experience as a former mailman admin and listadmin mailman is a
>>> no-go.
>>> Getting our feature set even nearly into mailman is impossible, takes years
>&g
Hi Alex,
Alexander Wirt:
>> While I agree that some "more modern" going way would be nice for lists,
>> I don't think that is an easy task. Nor one where DPL can do much
>> (unless listmasters need some resources that DPL can approve for such a
>> change). Its up to the listmasters, though as far
On 13/07/2004 Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> Consider the situation from their perspective. They have work to do in
> order for amd64 to enter the archive. From a certain group of developers,
> they face accusations of "stalling"[0], announcements made in apparent
> attempts to shame them into action[1]
8 matches
Mail list logo
