Craig Brozefsky wrote:
>
> As a user, I would prefer if it happened every time. With apt it is
> not really easy to know when non-free software is coming on too my
> system unless I'm particularly astute.
How comes ? I use apt combined with dselect so maybe I am missing some
points here. But I j
Hi,
I completely agree with Jason. I just want to add some more things
(already said this here and on IRC):
What I'm really missing in our current state is an explanation in the
description of non-free telling me why is that package there. You can
get these infos after you install the package or
Dale Scheetz wrote:
>
> > already a lot of packages that overwhelms the newcommer. I used to lose
> > a lot of time when I was installing for the first time a Debian, only
> > because of browsing our packages. And if we drop the dependencies, we
> > will look exactly like RH: we will have a bunch
Norbert Nemec wrote:
>
> Guess, that idea already has been discussed and ruled out, but still I think
> it may serve better:
>
> Why not put some kind of a sign on every non-free package, instead of moving
> those packages anywhere? There is a number of ways that could be done
> - something in th
raul wrote:
>
> I would like to make a list of what is required for now, so far:
>
> * Gifs for downloading from the Debian site
> * "Netscape Now" like buttons
> * 64X64 icons (Can someone please elaborate on this one and please
> provide some samples)
>
> Before I go ahead and make all these i
Adam Di Carlo wrote:
>
> * other details, such as working out version for 64x64 icons, etc
>(Raul's a real photoshop wiz)
I'd like to see something of A4 size to print it on my T-shirts :-)
Ionutz
--
Mental backup in progress - Do Not Disturb!
--
http://borco-ei.eng.hokudai.ac.jp/~borco/
6 matches
Mail list logo
