skipped at installation-media-boot time that could imply
skipping at install time too)
But just to be clear: not a blocker for me in any sense. I'm sure this
kind of thing will end up being done *anyway* regardless of whether the
GR itself requires it.
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane
being explicit that we will provide ways to disable at
*installation time* too? Arguably this is implied by '[t]he target
system will *also* be configured to use the non-free-firmware component
_by default_ …' already but I think we could stand to be more concrete
about that.
Ch
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 08:24:03PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 01:47:41PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Iain Lane writes ("New amdendment proposal (Re: Proposed GR: Acknowledge
> > difficulty of declassifying debian-private)"):
> > > This
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 09:07:45AM +, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 09:55:52AM +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
> > > This message fits your description ("the author is quoting only his or
> > > her own
> > > text"), and so it would be allowe
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 08:45:05AM +, Bas Wijnen wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 09:14:00AM +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 07:14:39PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> > > * Iain Lane , 2016-09-20, 17:54:
> > > > There shall be no declassificatio
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 07:14:39PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Iain Lane , 2016-09-20, 17:54:
> > There shall be no declassification of any portion of the debian-private
> > archives, except when the authors of all material being declassified
> > have explicitly consented
On Fri, Sep 09, 2016 at 06:24:38PM +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
> […]
OK then, thanks for the discussion up-(the other)thread and on IRC. I
propose this as an amendment. AIUI it either needs to be seconded by K
developers or accepted as an amendment by Holger, Gunnar or whoever the
original propo
able to
propose it before I'm back - somebody else could do so.)
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer [ la...@debian.org ]
Ubuntu Developer [ la...@ubuntu.com ]
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 10:57:15PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 09:44:59PM +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 16, 2016 at 01:17:24PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > > 2. Debian listmasters and/or other individuals delegated by the DPL to
opriate.
(GRs are, of course, always going to be on the table regardless.)
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer [ la...@debian.org ]
Ubuntu Developer [ la...@ubuntu.com ]
sig
n of debian-private
>list archives" is repealed.
> 2. In keeping with paragraph 3 of the Debian Social Contract, Debian
>Developers are strongly encouraged to use the debian-private mailing
>list only for discussions that should not be disclosed.
>
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 12:00:03PM +0100, Iain Lane wrote:
> Also, what does "currently" ("already" in my text) mean? In stable or
> testing?
Okay, I see <20141017110531.ga11...@xanadu.blop.info> now.
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orange
maintainer reasonably desires for jessie.
Reasonable contributions to re-add or improve sysvinit support should
be accepted through the jessie release.
Also, what does "currently" ("already" in my text) mean? In stable or
testing?
Cheers,
--
Iain Lane
and seconding period of two weeks folowing the
proposal of an amendment, after which the amendment is withdrawn if
it has not received sufficient support.
Updates may also be made by the Debian Developers as a whole using
the standard General Resolution procedure.
ault, loose coupling
sysvinit comes from?
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer [ la...@debian.org ]
Ubuntu Developer [ la...@ubuntu.com ]
signa
15 matches
Mail list logo
