stalled systems by default. As a general policy, we still do
> not want to see other non-free software in use. Users may still enable
> the existing non-free component if they need it.
>
> We also need to do the work to make this happen:
>
> * in d-i, live-boot and elsewhere to ma
Margarita Manterola (2016-07-08):
> The Debian Constitution is very well written, in a way that is almost
> completely
> ungendered. The only gendered word left is the Chairman of the Technical
> Committee. There is no reason for this position to be gendered. Ungendered
> alternatives for Chair
Nicolas Dandrimont (2016-07-07):
> In 2005, the body of Debian Developers passed a General Resolution[1]
> requiring
> the creation of a declassification team for the debian-private mailing list.
> For the past ten years, the implementation of this GR has never materialized,
> despite an explicit
Hi,
Holger Wansing (2016-01-11):
> Holger Wansing wrote:
> > I have just committed this for the german d-i errata:
> >
> >
> > --- errata.wml 28 Oct 2015 20:18:01 - 1.117
> > +++ errata.wml 5 Dec 2015 22:08:26 -
> > @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> > #use wml::debian::template title="Debian-I
Hi,
[ Initially a debian-boot vs. debian-www topic but I think
vote.debian.org might be having a similar issue. ]
Holger Wansing (2015-10-31):
> Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Could it be that images.data's being updated doesn't lead to a rebuild
> > of the relevant tra
Enrico Zini (2015-05-24):
> I have also implemented audit tracking of all changes to Person records
> on nm.debian.org, which in turn allowed me to change the nightly
> maintenance scripts to do more aggressive imports of changes from
> keyrings and LDAP.
>
> I have also done quite a bit of manua
Stefano Zacchiroli (2014-12-01):
> ===
> The Constitution is amended as follows:
>
> ---
> --- constitution.txt.orig 2014-11-17 18:02:53.314945907 +0
Stefano Zacchiroli (2014-12-01):
> ===
> The Constitution is amended as follows:
>
> ---
> --- constitution.txt.orig 2014-11-17 18:02:53.314945907 +0
Lucas Nussbaum (2014-10-22):
> On 17/10/14 at 10:01 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > But designing and tuning alternative proposals might take time, so I
> > would prefer to wait a few days before reducing the discussion period,
> > to ensure that we vote with a sensible ballot. I will decide in t
Didier 'OdyX' Raboud (2014-10-22):
> Le mercredi, 22 octobre 2014, 13.34:27 Ian Jackson a écrit :
> > Jonas Smedegaard writes ("Re: Tentative summary of the amendments"):
> > > I too find it wrong to interpret Ian's text as a war between
> > > systemd and sysvinit - that's anything but "basically
Charles Plessy (2014-10-22):
>
>
> The Debian project asks its members to be considerate when proposing General
> Resolutions, as the GR process may be disruptive regardless of the outcome of
> the vote.
>
> Regarding the s
Charles Plessy (2014-10-19):
> ---
>
> The Debian project asks its members to be considerate when proposing General
> Resolutions, as the GR process may be disruptive regardless of the outcome of
> the vote.
>
> Regarding th
Luca Falavigna (2014-10-18):
> ** Begin Alternative Proposal **
>
> 0. Rationale
>
> Debian has decided (via the Technical Committee) to change its
> default init system for the next release. The Technical Committee
> decided not to decide about the question of "coupling" i.e. whether
>
gregor herrmann (2014-10-16):
> On Thu, 16 Oct 2014 19:24:52 +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
>
> > > As Matthew said, I don't think further lengthy discussion of the
> > > issues is likely to be productive, and therefore hope we can bring
> > > this swiftly to a vote. This is particularly true
Sorry for the slight hijack but:
| Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 19:29:19 +0100
| From: Neil McGovern
| To: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
| Subject: Re: Both DPL candidates: handling social conflict
| X-Mailer: Apple Mai
Kurt Roeckx (2014-03-06):
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 07:09:49PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Hmm. Looking at my original message in my MUA it says
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> > which is not right. Perhaps your MUA has done a latin-1 to utf-8
> > encoding, meaning that yo
Charles Plessy (20/03/2013):
> In Debian, we stay member until we die or quit (or very exceptionally, are
> expelled). […]
Or spotted as being MIA. This might help:
http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/MIA
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Vincent Cheng (18/03/2013):
> Slightly off-topic, but since you bring up GNOME 3 as a specific
> example of how Debian has regressed in terms of accessibility...how
> exactly has GNOME regressed? It still has AFAIK the same set of
> accessibility features [1] as it did previously with GNOME 2, and
Amaya (19/05/2012):
> The Reply-To isn't set. So what email address should my vote be sent
> to?
>
> Thanks, and excuse the silly question.
The vote isn't open yet. Wait for a ballot on dda/dv, from the
secretary. ;)
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Francesca Ciceri (07/05/2012):
> TEXT TO BE VOTED STARTS HERE
>
> The Debian Project welcomes and encourages participation by everyone.
>
> No matter how you identify yourself or how others perceive you: we
> welcome you. We welcome contributions from everyone as long as they
> interact
Hi.
Margarita Manterola (24/03/2010):
> > Suppose that you would not run for DPL: Who would you vote and
> > why?
>
> I would, and will, vote for all of them. I won't disclose the
> particular order, but they'll all be above NOTA.
That's a very interesting detail, thanks.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signat
Marc Haber (15/03/2010):
> Maybe we failed to provide such a "two-liner", which in fact is,
> unfortunately, much more complicated than one might think naively.
> Additionally, example code for policy-rc.d is (almost?) nonexistent.
Maybe running reportbug would be more efficient than talking abou
(Dropping -devel…)
Bill Allombert (23/03/2009):
> Hello developers,
>
> I am hereby proposing the amendement below to the General resolution
> entitled "Enhance requirements for General resolutions".
>
> PROPOSAL START
>
>
Stefano Zacchiroli (02/03/2009):
> PS oh gosh, I didn't realize how embarrassing can be to send the
>"nominate myself" post until now :)
I can guess, especially when one is the first to do so, showing to the
whole world how power-greedy one is! :p
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Dig
Robert Millan (12/01/2009):
> And I lost count on how many times I repeated that, but will do as
> long as necessary.
We don't need that kind of behaviour *again*.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Josselin Mouette (18/12/2008):
> Le jeudi 18 décembre 2008 à 08:44 -0600, Manoj Srivastava a écrit :
> > As to the people who emailed me that they are putting
> > together a petition for the DAM to have me removed from the project,
> > I hear you too.
>
> Regardless of what you did as th
John H. Robinson, IV (15/12/2008):
> I support the right or priviledge of a researcher to run a poll on the
> topic of their choosing. I further support the right or priviledge of
> a Debian Developer to run a poll on a topic associatied with Debian.
>
> I support this specific poll.
>
> Keep up
devo...@vote.debian.org (15/12/2008):
> digraph Results {
> ranksep=0.25;
> "Ask the DAMs to postpone the changes until vote or consensus.\n4.49" [
> style="filled" , fontname="Helvetica", fontsize=10 ];
> "Ask the DAMs to postpone the changes until vote or consensus.\n4.49" ->
> "Further D
Thomas Weber (15/12/2008):
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2008/11/msg00046.html
Let's quote for people following at home:
| >So, we now have a discussion period of two weeks, though I would
| > prefer to actually start the vote Sunday 00:00:00 UTC (on November
| > 23th, or, if the
Debian Project Secretary (13/12/2008):
>
>FIRST CALL FOR VOTES FOR THE Lenny Release General Resolution
>= === = === === = === === ==
>
> Voting period starts 00:00:01 UTC on Sunday, December 14th, 2008
> Votes must be received by 23:59:59 UTC on S
Robert Luberda (14/12/2008):
> > - - -=-=-=-=-=- Don't Delete Anything Between These Lines =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> > 5efca670-0e7b-480e-9899-ecce3446e087
> > [ 3 ] Choice 1: Ask the DAMs to postpone the changes until vote or
> > consensus.
> > [ 2 ] Choice 2: Invite the DAM to further discuss until vo
Hello DPL,
I'd like to point you to the following mail by Raphaël on -vote. It is
also available at [1].
1. http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2008/12/msg00038.html
Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (11/12/2008):
> Manoj, I still object to voting all at once and I'm convinced that you
> will
Josselin Mouette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (17/11/2008):
> > > I'm not really pleased with the trolls that arise on the subject
> > > prior to every release.
> >
> > May I ask who are those "trolls" you refer to?
>
> Maybe Robert Millan?
Given his asking “who” rather than “what”, looks like a rather n
Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (14/11/2008):
> I'm hereby proposing the following general resolution:
>
> | Firmware is data such as microcode or lookup tables that is loaded into
> | hardware components in order to make the component function properly.
> | It is not code that is run on the h
Peter Palfrader <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (29/10/2008):
> I hereby propose this alternate option/amendment and am asking for seconds.
>
> | The Debian Project recognizes that many contributors to the project are
> not
> | working withing established frameworks of Debian and thus are not
> provided
hink about
creating them, so that people could eventually vote for the DPL election
this year (2008 at the time of this writing).
Thank you for your commitment to the huge and never-ending task of
managing the Debian accounts.
--
Cyril Brulebois
PS: I hope you don't mind a possible dupli
e of runs each *year*?
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgp1kNoffFrgL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
th
[EMAIL PROTECTED], and since you're still
wondering about RC/RG bugs, I'm answering these questions.
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgp8ZZbMd4K90.pgp
Description: PGP signature
correct.
> I must have missed the change in the release goals to require GCC 4.3
> when it came out. If the bug had been tagged "serious" I would have
> uploaded the fix as soon as possible.
You don't read debian-devel-announce, do you?
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpPu53fo9L3x.pgp
Description: PGP signature
the NM templates should cover it.
FTR, d-d-a: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpkVft0uk8ef.pgp
Description: PGP signature
commit.
Hi,
may I ask whether you have examples in mind, and how you would define
“is active”?
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpGO2p7JUKKX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
7;'? I don't think so.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgph0rm5SbdZa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
for help or peer
review, though asking the porter/patch submitter for explanations, and
eventually the -bsd list, should be sufficient. But I agree that there
might be better semantics (set of) (user)tags.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgp9s8Y3hjprZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (27/02/2007):
> I'd rather have a DPL that can prioritize and spend his time on what
> would benefit the project the most [...]
Like talking about ponies?
--
Cyril Brulebois
pgpsMgHYKjhFF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
44 matches
Mail list logo