Re: PROPOSED: [CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT] Alternate disambiguation of 4.1.5

2000-10-10 Thread Christian Hammers
Hallo On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 12:32:00PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > It seems to me that a 3:1 majority is exceedingly excessive; requiring > 75% of people to agree seems to me to be an unreasonably high limit. We talk about changing our constitution! 3:1 is by no means too high. bye, -christi

Re: PROPOSED: [CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT] Alternate disambiguation of 4.1.5

2000-10-10 Thread Christian Hammers
Hallo On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 12:32:00PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > It seems to me that a 3:1 majority is exceedingly excessive; requiring > 75% of people to agree seems to me to be an unreasonably high limit. We talk about changing our constitution! 3:1 is by no means too high. bye, -christ