few hours, the last time it took ~ 12 hours for the
email to show up, hence my double post to d-d-a a while back.
Thanks,
Chris Cheney
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 12:02:55AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> On 2004-07-14 19:42:22 +0100 Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 07:00:42PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> >>On 2004-07-14 18:03:28 +0100 Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 08:16:59PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> could you please try to not interpret things in Daniel's mail he didn't
> say? He didn't tell anything about his intentions to communicate about
> amd64, but just that he doesn't like it if private off-hand remarks
> are cited in publ
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 07:00:42PM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> On 2004-07-14 18:03:28 +0100 Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Some people had
> >been using our conversation that I mentioned as proof that ftpmaster
> >can
> >sometimes be reasonable.
>
&g
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 12:22:02PM +0100, Daniel Silverstone wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Chris Cheney wrote:
> | More private discussion with whom ourselves? ftpmaster refuses to
> | comment on any email sent them, the only way I manage
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 10:57:00AM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 02:43:59PM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > The Debian project,
> >
> > based on its Social Contract stating that its priorities are its users
> > and free software,
> >
> > recognizing that the AMD64-ba
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 11:58:03PM -0700, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> There is no opposition to the amd64 port, and therefore no enemy in this
> situation. You are attacking your teammates.
Most teams actually communicate with each other.
Chris
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
a long way...
> --
> James - as always speaking only for myself
>
> [0] e.g. "every minute spent thinking of this fuckwit makes me lose
> one month of life" [Josselin Mouette, the GR Proposer on IRC,
> referring to Ryan Murray.]
> or "The buildd adm
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 01:26:00AM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> James is pretty easy to meet, he's been to the last two Debconfs at
> least. You have to be trying fairly hard to miss him too.
I would love to go to Debconf's however they are always very far away (US)
and thus expensive to a
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 12:36:35AM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> I really don't see this problem. I have absolutely no problem
> communicating with James, in fact I'm doing so right now. Nothing to do
> with this issue, just two developers communicating with each other.
>
> I strongly susp
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 03:46:06PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 09:40:29PM +0200, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> > #include
> > * Ingo Juergensmann [Tue, Jul 13 2004, 08:12:22PM]:
>
> > > This issue has been raised many, many times before, because part of
> > > ftp-masters are as
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 05:43:18PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-07-13 at 11:13 -0500, Chris Cheney wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 03:05:54PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > >
> > > Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > >
> >
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 11:36:22AM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 10:03:47AM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
> > Perhaps you could suggest a preferable course of action for him to
> > follow instead.
>
> I think there are several problems that need to be solved.
>
> The big one is
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 04:29:39PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Robert Millan wrote:
>
> >When you accused me of interpreting official documents "pedanticaly", I
> >wondered what you meant exactly with being pedantic.
>
> Please don't top-post, it makes the baby Jesus cry.
>
> More seriously
I second this proposal.
Someone mentioned that my post[0] implies that ftpmaster will be solving
this problem soon. I will believe it when I see it. We tried contacting
ftpmaster for weeks/months? about the issue with no response. The post
was just to state I got a statement out of them finally. f
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 03:05:54PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
> Josselin Mouette wrote:
>
> >1. that the next Debian GNU/Linux release, codenamed "sarge", will=20
> > include the "amd64" architecture, based on the work currently hosted=20
> > at http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/ ;
>
On Sun, Jun 20, 2004 at 10:59:44AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Are you dumb or a lying? Again: Our users are served good by:
> - a current stable release
> - free software
>
> At the moment, we don't have any of them. Our stable release contains
> items which are non-free, according to your inte
17 matches
Mail list logo
