Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> It seems that your MUA does use neither In-Reply-To: nor References:
> headers. That breaks threads and makes a lot of noise. Please change
> your MUA (or MTA? as it seems that's because your mail goes through
> Exchange), or stop posting here. That makes your mails espe
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> | as long as we are legally allowed to do so, and the formware is
> | distributed under a DFSG free license.
This needs to be made clearer.
I assume that your intention is to say "GPL'd (or otherwise DFSG-free
licensed) firmware without source is allowed, but e
Frederik Schueler wrote:
> this means we actually have to review all licenses before the release,
Indeed, I have been under the impression that *every* maintainer must
*always* check that *all* the files they are packaging are properly
licensed and distributable by Debian. I must have been wrong?
Martin Schulze wrote:
> > > Technically, if Aj is deposed, steve will be as well. And as I
said,
> > > if Aj is retiring from dunc-tank, then Steve's position has to be
> > > clarified in a second stage IMHO yes. Nothing has been done
"against"
> > > Steve's position as DPL-Assistant, especial
Hi,
may I propose a simpler procedure.
> 1. The electronic mailing list designated is
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] This is the authoritative source of
>the full text of all resolutions, as well as the supporting
>arguments and other material.
> 2. Every proposal and sponsoring email must be sig
While the Constitution, as I read it, gives the developers the power to
recall the DPL even without reason if they wish, my very humble opinion
is that it should be done *only* when the DPL is guilty of something
*very* bad. Please explain why that would be the case.
If you feel that the DPL shoul
6 matches
Mail list logo
