On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 02:35:24PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Phil Morrell writes:
>
> > It's been my impression [citation needed] that pristine-tar/lfs still
> > exists mainly out of inertia and simple tooling around it that makes it
> > more of a why not. If we're gaining a mostly git-native
On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 10:53:46AM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> "Andrew M.A. Cater" writes:
>
> > In practice, the free installer is useless on its own.
>
> That is not my experience -- I'm using Debian through its installer on a
> number of laptops, desktops and servers, and for my purposes
On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 10:37:44AM -0400, Milan Kupcevic wrote:
> On 6/18/22 19:43, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote:
> > Under 4.1.5 of the Constitution, the developers by way of GR are the
> > body who has the power to issue nontechnical statements.
> >
> > This is a proposal for Debian to create
On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 09:54:40PM -0500, Tiago Bortoletto Vaz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 07:46:16PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> [...]
>
> > I have argued against this notion that private votes in some way
> > contradicts our principles of tra
On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 11:13:03PM -0500, Harlan Lieberman-Berg wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I propose the following ballot option for the current GR:
>
> Rationale
>
> While I agree that there are some votes which, due to their nature,
> may be so controversial that the potential for a
On Fri, Feb 18, 2022 at 01:13:50PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote:
> On Sun, 2022-02-13 at 14:28:44 -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > This starts informal discussion of a proposed general resolution to
> > amend the constitution. I am not seeking sponsors at this time.
> > Comments including support or al
On Sun, Feb 13, 2022 at 02:28:44PM -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Rationale
> =
>
> During the vote for GR_2021_002o, several developers said they were
> uncomfortable voting because under the process at that time, their name
> and ballot ranking would be public.
> A number of participants in
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 02:55:45PM +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
> Antonio Terceiro writes:
>
> > On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 12:01:43PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> >> On 2/14/22 10:36, Philip Hands wrote:
> >> > I don't actually care if our votes are readable
On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 12:01:43PM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> On 2/14/22 10:36, Philip Hands wrote:
> > I don't actually care if our votes are readable by the general public,
> > so would one way of addressing the concerns of attracting abuse would be
> > to make the tally sheet only available
On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 02:40:55PM +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> This is a draft for a GR I would like to propose.
>
> Cancel this year's in-person Debian Developers Conference DebConf20
> --
As said in the DebConf website, the decision of holding DebConf20
in-person is yet to be mad
First of all, I would like to thank those who took the time to make proposals.
This is a very draining issue, and I thought more than twice about saying
something about it publicly at all. I hope that this is useful.
My position
---
I think systemd is better than anything that came befor
triggering the General Resolution override clause
> in the TC's resolution of the 11th of February.
>
> The TC's decision on the default init system for Linux in jessie stands
> undisturbed.
>
> However, the TC resolution is altered to add the additional text above
> in sections #1, #2 and #3.
>
> ** End Proposal **
Seconded.
--
Antonio Terceiro
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
12 matches
Mail list logo
