On Mon, 2025-05-12 at 16:00 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Sean Whitton writes ("Re: tag2upload - request for DPL action"):
> > We should have been invited to perform testing by the FTP Team.
> > Indeed, I just tried a test upload of dgit-test-dummy, and it was
> > REJECT'd with a strange error messa
On Sun, 2024-06-16 at 20:40 +0200, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
> Do we delete all our old snapshots from snapshot.d.o if/when
> infringing or non-Free content is detected in a package?
> AFAIK: no we don't.
Access to packages on snapshot.d.o has been blocked several times in
the past due to issues wi
On Wed, 2024-06-12 at 10:43 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> There was more confusion about this point than I had anticipated, so
> I want to emphasize that the dgit-repos server is not a forge, is not
> a competitor to Salsa, doesn't replace Salsa in any way, and is not
> something that people interac
On Sat, 2018-03-31 at 15:37 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> The ftp team is granted powers over the work of all people in Debian
> directly from the DPL,
To be slightly picky here, and possibly veering a little off the topic,
the FTP Masters are delegated. Any powers that the remainder of the
team ha
On Sun, 2016-07-31 at 15:42 +0530, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
> Hello there,
>
> [Please Cc me on reply not subscribed to debian-vote]
>
> I'm voting for the first time and received the ballot but I'm confused
> with following paragraph in ballot
>
> > The responses to a valid vote shall be signed by
On 2014-11-10 7:05, Andrew McGlashan wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi Steven,
On 10/11/2014 10:15 AM, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
We discussed kfreebsd at length, but are not satisfied that a
release with Jessie will be of sufficient quality. W
On 2014-10-30 9:43, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
Hi,
Florian Lohoff:
There are tons of people who think that all the above functionality
does
not belong to a init systemd or ecosystem.
There are also tons of people who could care less, as long as it gets
the
job done.
fwiw, as this seems to be
On 2014-10-29 16:13, Ian Jackson wrote:
Marco d'Itri writes ("Re: Legitimate exercise of our constitutional
decision-making processes [Was, Re: Tentative summary of the
amendments]"):
ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk wrote:
>I don't want to be having this conversation again in a year's time,
And
On Fri, 2014-10-17 at 13:15 -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> The TC stated, and passed a resolution to the effect of Debian
> continuing to support multiple init systems. If, as you say, "Gnome
> right now is installable with systemd-shim + sysvinit," those sound
> like release critical bugs in
On 2014-10-17 12:00, Aigars Mahinovs wrote:
On 17 October 2014 13:27, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
If it passes (which I consider to be sufficiently unlikely to wonder
why
the *censored* Ian even bothered, but whatever), _then_ these lists
are the
right places to discuss the implications. Until the
On 2014-10-17 9:45, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
On Thursday 16 October 2014 11:58 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Speaking for no-one other than myself, I _am_ very unhappy that given
how long the discussion has been rumbling on for, and how much
opportunity there has been, that anyone thought that two
On Thu, 2014-10-16 at 22:00 +0300, Aigars Mahinovs wrote:
> We have all kinds of policies about what is fine in a package and what
> is a Release Critical bug. That is a big part of what makes a
> distribution. This simply adds - "must be able to work with any init
> system running at PID 1" to tho
On Thu, 2014-10-16 at 19:01 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Stefano Zacchiroli writes ("Re: Re-Proposal - preserve freedom of choice of
> init systems"):
> > I've sympathy for the motives behind this GR, but discovering that those
> > teams might have their Jessie plans disrupted---on a very short
> >
On Sat, 2013-04-13 at 13:52 +0300, vangelis mouhtsis wrote:
> i tryed to vote but failed. is the vote only for Debian project
> members?
Yes. Reading the mail should have made this quite clear.
NOTE: The vote must be GPG signed (or PGP signed) with your key that is
in the Debian keyring.
The m
On 03.04.2013 06:09, Chris Knadle wrote:
On Tuesday, April 02, 2013 20:34:28, Russ Allbery wrote:
Note that we already did do something about it by deprecating close
in the
BTS in favor of sending a real email message to -done that is copied
to
the submitter. The Debian BTS now nags the mainta
On Sat, 2007-02-10 at 15:27 +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> > Heck, before m68k was dropped as a factor in package propagation into
> > testing, I was routinely finding bogus dep-waits set by the m68k buildd
> > maintainers themselves, and that's only
"Wouter Verhelst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote, Thursday, February 09, 2006
8:08 AM
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2006 at 06:26:27AM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote:
[...]
>> For this reason, we encourage documentation authors to license
>> their works (or dual-license, together with the GFDL) under the
>>
On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 21:48 +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
> Hi,
> * Debian Project Secretary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-02-28 21:36]:
> > The nomination period is at an end, with six candidates
> > standing forth to be counted. We are now in the campaigning period.
> > The candidates are:
> >
18 matches
Mail list logo
