ould suffice; it should certainly
be an easier sell.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here is the current version
This one looks good; I'll second it.
> I propose we adopt a foundation document that tries to provide
> guidance and explanation for the transitions required whenever a
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Here is the current version
This one looks good; I'll second it.
> I propose we adopt a foundation document that tries to provide
> guidance and explanation for the transitions required whenever a
>
ubstitute [1, 4].
> [ ] Choice 1: Proposal A [3:1 super majority needed]
[...]
> these proposals require a 3:1 super-majority in order to pass (as they
[...]
> Foundation Documents class which requires 3:1 majority to change and
Which is it? Or is it "supermajority"?
--
Aaron M.
ubstitute [1, 4].
> [ ] Choice 1: Proposal A [3:1 super majority needed]
[...]
> these proposals require a 3:1 super-majority in order to pass (as they
[...]
> Foundation Documents class which requires 3:1 majority to change and
Which is it? Or is it "supermajority"?
--
Aaron M.
pelled with Ss, not Cs.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.
pelled with Ss, not Cs.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
d the
> + Debian Free Software Guidelines. The list of the documents
> + that are deemed to be "Foundation Documents" may be changed
> + by the developers only by changing this clause, which needs
> + according to 5.1 a 3:1 majority.
(preferred)
- --
Aa
he
> + Debian Free Software Guidelines. The list of the documents
> + that are deemed to be "Foundation Documents" may be changed
> + by the developers only by changing this clause, which needs
> + according to 5.1 a 3:1 majority.
(preferred)
- --
Aaron
Options which the voters rank above the default option
> are options they find acceptable. Options ranked below the default
> options are options they find unacceptable.
...and asked why "RATIONALE" was quoted, though I care more about the
apostrophes.
--
Aaron M. Ucko,
but I don't think that's relevant to
quorum.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.
but I don't think that's relevant to
quorum.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
pologies for not rechecking.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.
Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 12:02:14PM -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> > Like Sam, I see no particular need for salt beyond the username.
>
> Uh.. Sam who? I saw no email. The username is insufficient salt; the
Sam Hartman <[EMAIL
pologies for not rechecking.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
there were probably hours when very few
initial votes came in.)
One remedy would be not to post the list of who had voted until after
the election.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.
Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 12:02:14PM -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> > Like Sam, I see no particular need for salt beyond the username.
>
> Uh.. Sam who? I saw no email. The username is insufficient salt; the
Sam Hartman <[EMAIL
there were probably hours when very few
initial votes came in.)
One remedy would be not to post the list of who had voted until after
the election.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.
--
To
Options which the voters rank above the default option
Why the quotes? (I've been wondering about them for a while,
actually, but never got around to asking.)
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.
Options which the voters rank above the default option
Why the quotes? (I've been wondering about them for a while,
actually, but never got around to asking.)
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for mor
te secretary has some such power.
Er, I think Raul's point is that if some (unprivileged) developer
favoring the default option does get word of an election whose turnout
might be low, he or she may have trouble deciding whether to vote for
the default option or not to vote at all if qu
te secretary has some such power.
Er, I think Raul's point is that if some (unprivileged) developer
favoring the default option does get word of an election whose turnout
might be low, he or she may have trouble deciding whether to vote for
the default option or not to vote at all if qu
..., H_n (where n may be 1) such that H_1 defeats F, G defeats H_n,
AND for every i from 1 to n-1, H_{i+1} defeats H_i.
which I'm not convinced is better.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.
..., H_n (where n may be 1) such that H_1 defeats F, G defeats H_n,
AND for every i from 1 to n-1, H_{i+1} defeats H_i.
which I'm not convinced is better.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more in
> K2Ma3OTtD5RUQevu0hBReus=3D
> =3Ds3m+
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
s
description:
# On <>, expect the processed votes, of the form:
#V: -324-1
# interpreted as rating the 6th option as your 1st preference, etc
# Assumes options 2, 3, 4 and 6 are all preferred over options 1 and
# 5, but no preference is given between options 1 and 5
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC
s
description:
# On <>, expect the processed votes, of the form:
#V: -324-1
# interpreted as rating the 6th option as your 1st preference, etc
# Assumes options 2, 3, 4 and 6 are all preferred over options 1 and
# 5, but no preference is given between options 1 and 5
--
Aaron M. Ucko, K
g issues (what else? ;-)) led me to switch to a full-fledged
PostgreSQL backend.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for more info.
king issues (what else? ;-)) led me to switch to a full-fledged
PostgreSQL backend.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] for more info.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
29 matches
Mail list logo
