Re: Possible draft non-free firmware option with SC change

2022-09-15 Thread Bill Allombert
On Thu, Sep 15, 2022 at 03:14:05PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > IME, often, lawyers go "this probably won't do anything, but it can't > harm us, so meh, let's try and see what we can get from a judge if it > ever comes to it". > > Or even "I've seen this in other licenses, can't hurt, let's cop

Re: new proposal: free and and non-free installers with SC change

2022-09-15 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Le mercredi, 14 septembre 2022, 17.00:26 h CEST Holger Levsen a écrit : > - > Proposal F > > This ballot option supersedes the Debian Social Contract (a foundation > document) under point 4.1.5 of the constitution and thus requires a 3:1 > majori

Re: new proposal: free and and non-free installers with SC change

2022-09-15 Thread Kurt Roeckx
> seconded Your message wasn't signed. Kurt

Re: Possible draft non-free firmware option with SC change

2022-09-15 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 09:13:50AM +, Bill Allombert wrote: > Le Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 10:17:16PM +0200, Tobias Frost a écrit : > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 07:10:24PM +, Bill Allombert wrote: > > > Le Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 02:37:49PM +, Bill Allombert a écrit : > > > > Le Tue, Sep 13, 202

Re: Requesting Extension (was: Re: Changing how we handle non-free firmware)

2022-09-15 Thread Jonathan Carter (highvoltage)
Hi Everyone On 2022/09/07 18:26, Jonathan Carter (highvoltage) wrote: As per the Debian Constitution[1] (4.2¶3), I'm requesting an extension for the discussion period of 7 days. Thank you all for taking the time to polish or add voting options over the last week. I believe that the options w