Hello Simon,
Simon Richter dijo [Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 07:34:10PM +0200]:
> > I don't see a difference between having non-free files in the archive
> > and non-free files on the installation images. If having individual
> > non-free files was not acceptable then we would have to define the
> > arch
Steve McIntyre dijo [Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 08:58:21PM +0100]:
> (...)
> So, I propose the following:
>
> =
>
> We will include non-free firmware packages from the
> "non-free-firmware" section of the Debian archive on our official
> media (installer images and live
On 2022-08-20 21:49, Bart Martens wrote:
3) Ensure that the filename of the installation media includes
"non-free-firmware" or something similar so that it is clear to
everyone what they are getting into. Debian has had such a long
history of not including non-free bits in the ins
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 11:36:33PM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 16594 March 1977, Timo Lindfors wrote:
>
> > 3) Ensure that the filename of the installation media includes
> > "non-free-firmware" or something similar so that it is clear to
> > everyone what they are getting into. Debia
> We will include non-free firmware packages from the
> "non-free-firmware" section of the Debian archive on our official
> media (installer images and live images). The included firmware
> binaries will *normally* be enabled by default where the system
> determines that they are required, but wher
Hi Steve,
=
We will include non-free firmware packages from the
"non-free-firmware" section of the Debian archive on our official
media (installer images and live images). The included firmware
binaries will *normally* be enabled by default where the system
deter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 18.08.22 21:58, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> So, I propose the following:
>
> =
>
> We will include non-free firmware packages from the
> "non-free-firmware" section of the Debian archive on our official
> media (insta
7 matches
Mail list logo
