> "Russ" == Russ Allbery writes:
Russ> Wouter Verhelst writes:
>> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 08:55:19PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>>> Instead of the quite complex procedure proposed by Wouter,
>>> couldn't we patch the DPL's power to increase or decrease the
>>> the disc
Wouter Verhelst writes:
> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 08:55:19PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>> Instead of the quite complex procedure proposed by Wouter, couldn't we
>> patch the DPL's power to increase or decrease the the discussion period
>> to allow the DPL to extend it beyond three weeks?
> Th
Hi Sean,
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 12:09:41PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I am interested in this informal proposal from Russ, which has not
> received much explicit feedback:
>
> On Sun 07 Nov 2021 at 03:53PM -08, Russ Allbery wrote:
>
> > I wonder if you could make the system eve
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 08:55:19PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> First,
>
> > Many thanks to Russ and Wouter for all their work on this.
>
> +1
>
>
> If I understand correctly, most agree that we would like to keep
> the discussion period short in most cases. But at the same time, in
Hi,
First,
> Many thanks to Russ and Wouter for all their work on this.
+1
If I understand correctly, most agree that we would like to keep
the discussion period short in most cases. But at the same time, in
exceptional circumstances, some would like a way to extend it.
Instead of the quite c
Dear all,
I am interested in this informal proposal from Russ, which has not
received much explicit feedback:
On Sun 07 Nov 2021 at 03:53PM -08, Russ Allbery wrote:
> I wonder if you could make the system even simpler, producing a scheme
> that has some admirable simplicity advantages over my pr
Hello,
I too would like to second the following quoted proposal. Thanks Russ.
On Thu 25 Nov 2021 at 07:25PM -08, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Here is an updated version of my proposal, which incorporates the formal
> amendment to change the default option for TC resolutions to also be "None
> of the a
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 09:31:42AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Wouter Verhelst writes:
>
> > aaand this should've been signed. Good morning.
>
> > On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 09:50:14AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>
> >> All this changes my proposal to the below. I would appreciate if my
>
Wouter Verhelst writes:
> aaand this should've been signed. Good morning.
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 09:50:14AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
>> All this changes my proposal to the below. I would appreciate if my
>> seconders would re-affirm that they agree with the changes I propose,
>> an
On 2021-11-23 02 h 50, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> ... and then I realize I *also* made a (small, but crucial) mistake:
>
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 05:15:34PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> [...]
>> Section A
>> -
>>
>> Replace section A as per Russ' proposal, with the following changes:
>>
I second the below amendament.
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 09:53:50AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 09:50:14AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > ... and then I realize I *also* made a (small, but crucial) mistake:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 05:15:34PM +0200, Wouter Verh
11 matches
Mail list logo
