Re: Draft proposal for resolution process change (v2)

2021-10-16 Thread Bill Allombert
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 09:58:23AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > I think we should aim at shortening the voting period too, but likely not > by much. I would make the voting period last at least 9 days (and no more > than 14) with a requirement to include two week-ends. Then the secretary > shoul

Re: Draft proposal for resolution process changes

2021-10-16 Thread Russ Allbery
Richard Laager writes: > First off, let me say I have no objections to your positions on > this. Also, I'm honestly not trying to argue in circles. I'm > specifically trying to confine my replies to only newly presented > issues. I'm not feeling like the conversation is circular at all, to note.

Re: Draft proposal for resolution process change (v2)

2021-10-16 Thread Russ Allbery
Bill Allombert writes: > Generally speaking, while I am in favor of making the decision-making > process fairer and less subject to interpretation, I am not in favor of > making it faster. Three weeks is already a very short time in Debian > term. A fast decision making process could quickly le

Re: Draft proposal for resolution process change (v2)

2021-10-16 Thread Bill Allombert
On Fri, Oct 15, 2021 at 10:56:44AM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > Bill Allombert writes: > > > I do believe reducing the discussion period gives too much head start to > > the proposing parties, by contrast to others developers that may not > > have allocate time to participate in such discussion a