Re: having public irc logs?

2017-04-07 Thread Chris Lamb
Dear Gianfranco, Apologies for the delay in getting back to you. > we don't have a public irc log system, and most of the > conversations between us are happening there. Personally, I wouldn't say "most conversations" here, but I am trying to avoid this conversation becoming a debate on the minu

Re: having public irc logs?

2017-04-07 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
(this question was on debian-vote by purpose, and was directed to DPL, I'll drop -vote on the next email) >(Replies redirected to debian-project, since this has nothing to do >with the DPL election anymore.) sigh, I agree (I would have used -devel to have a public discussion, this wasn't the cas

Re: having public irc logs?

2017-04-07 Thread Lars Wirzenius
(Replies redirected to debian-project, since this has nothing to do with the DPL election anymore.) On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 07:51:21AM +, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > e.g. I think Release Team channel is useful to know if something bad > is going on, also Ftp channel or Buildd one. e.g. I ca

use matrix.org if you want logs (was: having public irc logs?)

2017-04-07 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Gianfranco Costamagna [2017-04-07 09:51 +0200]: > your points are clear, but still most of conversations are > *useful* to people not having an irc bouncer This is getting off-topic, but you could consider using matrix.org with its IRC bridges. Sign up using e.g. http://riot.im/app a

Re: having public irc logs?

2017-04-07 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hello, >If you follow your way of thinking (which is wrong here, btw :) ), you >end up requiring that every time two Developers meet and speak about [...] >Most of our IRC channels are public, and that's how it should be. >However, there's a difference between "anyone can join and follow the >c