Re: Proposed GR: Repeal the 2005 vote for declassification of the debian-private mailing list

2016-09-02 Thread Gunnar Wolf
Lars Wirzenius dijo [Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 11:27:31AM +0300]: > On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 11:15:05PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > > 1. The 2005 General Resolution titled "Declassification of debian-private > >list archives" is repealed. > > If we're going to have another discussion and vote about

Re: Proposed GR: Repeal the 2005 vote for declassification of the debian-private mailing list

2016-09-02 Thread Enrico Zini
On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 11:27:31AM +0300, Lars Wirzenius wrote: > * Whatever else people come up. Require that whoever starts a thread on -private that doesn't have [VAC] in the subject, explicitly states the privacy concerns on the message[1], and disclose accordingly. This could be implemented

Re: Proposed GR: Repeal the 2005 vote for declassification of the debian-private mailing list

2016-09-02 Thread Jakub Wilk
* Gunnar Wolf , 2016-09-01, 23:15: === BEGIN GR TEXT === Title: Acknowledge that the debian-private list will remain private. 1. The 2005 General Resolution titled "Declassification of debian-private list archives" is repealed. 2. In keeping with paragraph 3 of the Debian Social Contract, Debi

Re: Proposed GR: Repeal the 2005 vote for declassification of the debian-private mailing list

2016-09-02 Thread Lars Wirzenius
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 11:15:05PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > 1. The 2005 General Resolution titled "Declassification of debian-private >list archives" is repealed. If we're going to have another discussion and vote about this, I think it might be good to vote with a full spectrum of choices

Re: Proposed GR: Repeal the 2005 vote for declassification of the debian-private mailing list

2016-09-02 Thread Thibaut Paumard
I hereby second the proposal below: Le 02/09/2016 à 06:15, Gunnar Wolf a écrit : > Some weeks ago, Nicolas Dandrimont proposed a GR for declassifying > debian-private[1]. In the course of the following discussion, he > accepted[2] Don Armstrong's amendment[3], which intended to clarify the > meani