Fw: news

2015-09-09 Thread Calman Lobel
Hello! Important message, visit http://andy.ave81.com/hundred.php?2v Calman Lobel

Re: Restated Amendment: We Choose Wording of the Day

2015-09-09 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 07:30:43AM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote: > > "Kurt" == Kurt Roeckx writes: > Kurt> I really wish Andreas at least fixed the text of his > Kurt> resolution, I really don't want to hold a vote on a text > Kurt> that's not clear. > > So, you're hoping he would sta

Re: Restated Amendment: We Choose Wording of the Day

2015-09-09 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Kurt" == Kurt Roeckx writes: Kurt> I really wish Andreas at least fixed the text of his Kurt> resolution, I really don't want to hold a vote on a text Kurt> that's not clear. So, you're hoping he would state things in terms of a diff or something a lot closer to a diff? Basical

Re: Restated Amendment: We Choose Wording of the Day

2015-09-09 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 11:58:33PM +, Sam Hartman wrote: > Hi. It's not clear that my amendment with a minimal change has quite > enough support to be on the ballot. > > > would people be comfortable waiting a day or two more to see if we get > any more seconds and if not, then just going fo

Re: Restated Amendment: We Choose Wording of the Day

2015-09-09 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 08:49:03AM +0100, Philip Hands wrote: > I second the below amendment. I think that makes 5 second now, so I'll update the page with it later. Kurt

Re: Restated Amendment: We Choose Wording of the Day

2015-09-09 Thread Philip Hands
I second the below amendment. BTW I seconded Andreas's original GR too, but am persuaded by this so would like to see it on the ballot. Sam Hartman writes: > Restated to fix comments received. > For formality, to the extent that I am able, I withdraw my previous > amendment. > > As I discussed,