also sprach Kurt Roeckx [2015-04-01 01:03 +0200]:
> Voting period starts Wed Apr 1 00:00:00 UTC 2015
> Votes must be received by Tue Apr 14 23:59:59 UTC 2015
Or just go with a standard:
2015-04-01 00:00:00 UTC
--
.''`. martin f. krafft @martinkrafft
: :' : proud Debian developer
Debian Project Secretary - Kurt Roeckx writes:
> Hi,
Hi,
[...]
> There are 4 choices in the form, which you may rank with numbers between
> 1 and 4. In the brackets next to your preferred choice, place a 1.
> Place a 2 in the brackets next to your next choice. Continue until you
> reach your l
Hi,
The previous ballot had an error in it. Here is a fixed version:
Voting period starts Wed Apr 1 00:00:00 UTC 2015
Votes must be received by Tue Apr 14 23:59:59 UTC 2015
This vote is being conducted as required by the Debian Constitution.
You may see the constitution at http:
Hi,
This is the first call for votes for the Debian Project Leader
Elections 2015.
Voting period starts Wed Apr 1 00:00:00 UTC 2015
Votes must be received by Tue Apr 14 23:59:59 UTC 2015
This vote is being conducted as required by the Debian Constitution.
You may see the constitu
On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 12:07:07AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:53:20PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> > This is part of our history now and we can surely learn from past
> > experiences to be able to handle similar situations better in the
> > future.
>
> So, you
On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 12:57:30AM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> * Kurt Roeckx , 2015-04-01, 00:35:
> >>Here is the draft ballot:
> >>
> >>Voting period starts 00:00:00 UTC on Monday, April 1st, 2015
> >>Votes must be received by 23:59:59 UTC on Sunday, April 14th, 2015
> >
> >That should
* Kurt Roeckx , 2015-04-01, 00:35:
Here is the draft ballot:
Voting period starts 00:00:00 UTC on Monday, April 1st, 2015
Votes must be received by 23:59:59 UTC on Sunday, April 14th, 2015
That should of course be:
Voting period starts 00:00:00 UTC on Wednesday, April 1st
On Wed, Apr 01, 2015 at 12:34:01AM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> Here is the draft ballot:
>
> Voting period starts 00:00:00 UTC on Monday, April 1st, 2015
> Votes must be received by 23:59:59 UTC on Sunday, April 14th, 2015
That should of course be:
Voting period starts 00
Here is the draft ballot:
Voting period starts 00:00:00 UTC on Monday, April 1st, 2015
Votes must be received by 23:59:59 UTC on Sunday, April 14th, 2015
This vote is being conducted as required by the Debian Constitution.
You may see the constitution at http://www.debian.org/devel
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:53:20PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> This is part of our history now and we can surely learn from past
> experiences to be able to handle similar situations better in the
> future.
So, you got me curious: what do you think could have been handled better
in the debian-mul
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 02:37:12PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli
wrote:
> - I don't think the analogy with debian-multimedia is pertinent. At all.
> The problem with debian-multimedia.org was that the agenda of the
> people behind that 3rd party repository was completely unaligned (if
> not eve
Mehdi DOGGUY writes:
> Le 31 mars 2015 02:49, bjf...@gmail.com a écrit :
>>
>> After explaining we have an impressive ratio of female to male
>> participants in the Debian project as a whole (not just technical),
>> your suggestion is to get more women involved generally with Debian
>> (still not
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 09:13:10AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 20/03/15 at 20:02 +, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 08:56:23PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> > > also sprach Neil McGovern [2015-03-20 19:27 +0100]:
> > > > I'd be more sympathetic to funding someone (perh
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 05:50:06AM +, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 08:13:22PM +, Neil McGovern wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 08:58:35PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> > > Why? What target level are you aiming for and what's the rationale?
> > Hopefully https://lists.
On Tue, 31 Mar 2015, Charles Plessy wrote:
> If the discussion here would be about reforming the TC, I would
> propose that the nominations should be public, just as for the DPL
> election.
I have no problem with people nominating themselves publicly, but I
don't want to require public nominations
> "Anthony" == Anthony Towns writes:
Anthony> Number one is something like "where should the innovation come
from?"
GN> You may notice that unlike in previous years, I do not have a Grand
GN> Vision, not in the same sense at least.
MD> Of course, those are not trivial quest
> "Lucas" == Lucas Nussbaum writes:
Lucas> In five years, what should Debian's position and role be in the Free
Lucas> Software ecosystem?
Lucas> Are there other positions where we somehow risk ending up?
Lucas> What can we rely on to get to that ideal position/role?
Lucas
17 matches
Mail list logo
