On 16/12/14 at 21:35 -0400, David Prévot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le 16/12/2014 16:02, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
> > - 'Option 2' chooses to subtract the number of resignations/removals
> > from the required number of expiries, which could result in some TC
> > members exceeding the term limit, in
Hi,
Le 16/12/2014 16:02, Stefano Zacchiroli a écrit :
> - 'Option 2' chooses to subtract the number of resignations/removals
> from the required number of expiries, which could result in some TC
> members exceeding the term limit, in such events.
Thanks. Do I understand correctly that option
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 09:31:11PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 16/12/14 at 21:02 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 06:53:25PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > First draft:
> >
> > Looks quite good, but I'm unhappy about minor things.
> > I propose the following m
On 16/12/14 at 21:02 +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 06:53:25PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > First draft:
>
> Looks quite good, but I'm unhappy about minor things.
> I propose the following more balanced (IMO) version:
>
> ---
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 06:53:25PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> First draft:
Looks quite good, but I'm unhappy about minor things.
I propose the following more balanced (IMO) version:
Both proposals aim at creating a regul
On 16/12/14 at 17:21 +, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > "Jakub" == Jakub Wilk writes:
>
> Jakub> * Stefano Zacchiroli , 2014-12-16, 16:55:
> >>> It would also be nice that already suggested what the wording of
> >>> the options should be.
> >>
> >> How about:
> >>
> >
> "Jakub" == Jakub Wilk writes:
Jakub> * Stefano Zacchiroli , 2014-12-16, 16:55:
>>> It would also be nice that already suggested what the wording of
>>> the options should be.
>>
>> How about:
>>
>> 1) replace the two oldest members every year 2) replace the two
* Stefano Zacchiroli , 2014-12-16, 16:55:
It would also be nice that already suggested what the wording of the
options should be.
How about:
1) replace the two oldest members every year
2) replace the two oldest members every year, excluding resignations
To me, it's more confusing that descr
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:41:50AM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> It would also be nice that already suggested what the wording of
> the options should be.
How about:
1) replace the two oldest members every year
2) replace the two oldest members every year, excluding resignations
(Suggested by Luca
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:41:50AM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
> It would also be nice that already suggested what the wording of
> the options should be.
I really can't come up with good wordings on the difference, so
I'm probably going with "option 1" and "option 2".
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 08:53:11PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 01, 2014 at 12:20:25PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> > I'm hereby formally submitting the GR proposal included below between
> > dashed double lines, and calling for seconds.
>
> AFAICT the discussion period has
11 matches
Mail list logo
