Sam Hartman wrote:
> Matthew> Josh Triplett writes:
> >> On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 12:22:07PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> >> > What's the procedure for removing someone from the technical
> >> committee?
> >>
> >> Someone pointed out to me privately that there's a much eas
Hi Sam,
I surely hate noone here, thank you for your calming and insightful words.
cheers,
Holger
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
This is likely to be my last message on this sub-thread, or at least I'm
definitely slowing down responses.
Replying to two messages.
> "Matthew" == Matthew Vernon writes:
Matthew> Josh Triplett writes:
>> On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 12:22:07PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
>> > Wha
Josh Triplett writes:
> On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 12:22:07PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > What's the procedure for removing someone from the technical committee?
>
> Someone pointed out to me privately that there's a much easier way of
> handling this. See the "Maximum term for tech ctte membe
Le lundi 10 novembre 2014 à 09:44 +0100, Ansgar Burchardt a écrit :
> I think you forget the option that (I think) is the least personal
> damaging one:
>
> Option 0: Ask the member to consider stepping back himself.
This has already been asked, several times, by myself and by other
people.
I t
On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 12:22:07PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> What's the procedure for removing someone from the technical committee?
Someone pointed out to me privately that there's a much easier way of
handling this. See the "Maximum term for tech ctte members" thread.
Such a proposal would
> "Aigars" == Aigars Mahinovs writes:
Aigars> If you do not liek where Ian is coming from with his point of view -
Aigars> do not argue with him. Argue with other people. Or, better yet,
argue
Aigars> with the facts.
This sounds awfully similar to "Don't feed the trolls", and we
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 11:01:46AM +0200, Aigars Mahinovs wrote:
> On 10 November 2014 07:14, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > For the sake of clarity, I'd like to point out that I didn't start this
> > thread solely because of a single IRC log, but rather because of a
> > pattern of behavior over the las
On 10 November 2014 07:14, Josh Triplett wrote:
> For the sake of clarity, I'd like to point out that I didn't start this
> thread solely because of a single IRC log, but rather because of a
> pattern of behavior over the last year that shows no signs of changing.
I do find it quite alarming that
On 10 November 2014 10:42, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Hi Bas,
>
> Bas Wijnen writes:
>> On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 12:22:07PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
>>> 17:34:12 Diziet: I don't think that stating that we
>>> don't want to swap on upgrades is something we can agree on
>>> 17:34:25 Diziet: at l
Hi Andrey,
Andrey Rahmatullin writes:
> On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 12:22:07PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
>> What's the procedure for removing someone from the technical committee?
> Option 1: Agreement of DPL and an 1:1 majority in TC (6.2.5).
> Option 2: GR with a 2:1 majority to act with TC power
Hi Bas,
Bas Wijnen writes:
> On Sun, Nov 09, 2014 at 12:22:07PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
>> 17:34:12 Diziet: I don't think that stating that we
>> don't want to swap on upgrades is something we can agree on
>> 17:34:25 Diziet: at least, not while the GR is
>> happening which seems to directl
Several people forwarded me copies of the IRC log that Josh pointed to
here on the list today in response to my message this morning.
I responded to that off-list. I've been debating today whether to
respond on-list.
I'm not sure this is a good idea, but hey I'm trying my best to be
reasoned but
Bas Wijnen writes:
> The only problematic part I see is that he gets carried away at times.
> That's a very minor issue, and I forgive him, as long as he isn't
> insulting people.
He has certainly insulted me.
https://lists.debian.org/debian-ctte/2014/06/msg00040.html
If you don't know me ve
14 matches
Mail list logo
